LAWRENCE AUSTER writes:

America’s elite class, having nothing to believe in except for the sterile and empty abstractions of freedom and equality, no longer inhabit a coherent, concrete culture, and so were unable to conceive of or or agree upon a sensible project to replace the [World Trade Center]. (more…)

BRANDON writes:

I AM a 22-year-old male college student in Denver who reads your site daily. I have great appreciation for your message. I’m writing for two reasons. First, I have an interesting reflection to share with you and second, I shall make a request for some wisdom if you are willing to offer it. (more…)

ANGELO M. CODEVILLA writes in The American Spectator:

Never has there been so little diversity within America’s upper crust. Always, in America as elsewhere, some people have been wealthier and more powerful than others. (more…)

                   PLEASE CONSIDER making a donation to this site to ensure its continued existence. Do what you can to protect wholesome values and unsettling truths in a mad and unbelieving world. Thank you to those who have given.

MATAMOROS, known at this site for his comments on sex and the liberated woman, has started his own website, The Jacksonian Club, with the intention of bringing white men together for political activism. (more…)

Sebastien writes:

If the ideal of womanhood is to be wife, mother and homemaker, feminism will strip away all these gifts from her and all that will remain is her sexual appeal.  So while feminists claim that women have been sexual objects and need to be free, the truth is that women become sexual objects because of feminist ideology. If they are not going to becomes wives and homemakers, other than sex, there is little else they can do as women. (more…)

                         Charles Eric Maine’s Novel of Lesbian Dystopia

By Thomas F. Bertonneau

[Note: Another article by Bertonneau on World Without Men appeared this week in The Brussels Journal. The essay below was written for readers of The Thinking Housewife.]

BY WAY OF INTRODUCING both my topic and myself I might say that I am a lifelong aficionado of science fiction who is familiar with the genre in depth.  When I teach my course on science fiction at SUNY Oswego, I concentrate of classics texts of high literary merit – those by Edgar Allan Poe, H. G. Wells, Olaf Stapledon, and Ray Bradbury.  When I pursue my hobby I am less selective.  When I discover an unknown paperback title in a second hand bookshop, I frankly judge the item by its cover and where content is concerned I hope for the best.  Most of the mouldering paperbacks fall short of memorability.  Occasionally, however, I stumble across a jewel among the rubble, a short story or novel more or less forgotten that, for one reason or another, merits contemporary re-visitation.  One such, which I encountered again recently after a lapse of decades, is Charles Eric Maine’s World Without Men (1958)**, a novel about the long-term implications of birth control, abortion, and the so-called sexual revolution that treats these matters in a bold and prescient way.

It is safe to say that World Without Men could not be published today.  Editors, evaluating it in manuscript, would deem it absolutely politically incorrect; they would act to prevent Maine from perpetrating the lese majesté inherent in a story that unstintingly defends the idea of a natural order of human existence and which, describing homosexuality without embarrassment as “perversion,” argues that feminism (inherently homosexual in Maine’s view) is a totalitarian ideology.  Better to suppress such a thing.

In World Without Men,Maine tells a story in five quasi-independent but serially related episodes, unfolding a chronology that begins late in his own Twentieth Century and culminates fivethousand years from now in the year 7000 AD.  The first and fifth stories take place in 7000 AD; the setting and a recurrent point-of-view character unify them.  The second, third, and fourth stories fill in the chronological gaps, the second taking place (as one might suppose) before the advent of the Second Millennium, the third taking place fifty or seventy-five years after the second, and the fourth taking place perhaps two millenniabefore the first and the fifth (around 3000 AD).  The five episodes are (1) “The Man,” (2) “The Monkey,” (3) “The Girl,” (4) “The Patriarch,” and (5) “The Child.”  It seems logical to discuss “The Monkey” first, since this story represents the cause in response to which the other stories represent the consequences.  World Without Men is a novel about the liquidation of the male sex.

(more…)

(more…)

JULIAN writes:

I have been catching up on your site and just came across your marvelous short piece of Oct. 22, 2009: “The Unfaithful Wife.” It is the best essay I have seen on the the divorce epidemic. I’m a veteran of a stupid, destructive and monstrously wasteful divorce war, dragged through the courts for three years by a wife of 25 years for no reason other than her simply having become bored with being married. (Ok, being married to me.) That and a very rough menopause, but let’s not go there. 

I emerged from the divorce court sewerpipe relatively unscathed, notwithstanding that the other side used every single dirty trick in the divorce-lawyer playbook. But I’m a big boy and was able to look after myself better than most. I have no complaints for myself because after the initial shock I was not surprised. It’s a mean world. But I was shocked and horrified at what my ex-wife then did to my daughter who was ten years old at the start of it all. I am now a witness to my daughter doing something similarly destructive and cruel, with the active collusion and encouragement of her mother, who still lives alone after 20 years (and one proposal of remarriage, which she made to me, and which I respectfully declined; but that’s another story).  (more…)

HURRICANE BETSY WRITES:

I just had to write to tell you how “deep” that photo you posted the other day is for me!  I wasn’t even born in 1940 – heck, my parents hadn’t even met yet – but  I could have been one of those sleeping children.  The room – poorish looking – the sagging bed. The walls. The bedspread.    But the picture produced a happy mood in me.  (more…)

  THOMAS F. BERTONNEAU writes: I have not seen Eat Pray Love and have no plans to see it. (I’m pretty sure I’d rather be water-boarded.) I am simply commenting on the “still” from the movie posted in the recent entry. “Narcissism” is technically the right word for designating the psychological state that generates this image – of how people who think of themselves as “cool,” “sophisticated,” and “deeply spiritual” want to be seen – but by itself it is too clinical to do justice to the jejuneness of the mise-en-scène. Notice how Roberts and her actor-partner Javier Bardem are central to the tableau. The tableau itself is non-Western; it looks vaguely Indian or Ceylonese, but in a thoroughly scrubbed-up way. It is, in other words, nothing but a decorative scrim whose purpose is to set the mutual fixation of the two “stars” in an exotic (really, a faux exotic) context. Now consider the fixation, as such. Neither party is smiling, which one would expect if they were contemplating one another in a pitch of romantic emotion. So what exactly does the mutual absorption signify? I borrow a few ideas from René Girard, the world’s leading theoretician of narcissism, coquetry, self-involvement, and resentment. Roberts is looking at Bardem looking at her, and vice versa. Both are therefore looking at themselves, each using the other as a mirror. (This is the etymological narcissism: Narcissus glimpsed his reflection in a lily-pond and…

  IN A SURVEY of 3,000 employees in Britain, 63 percent of the women and 75 percent of the men agreed that men make the better workplace bosses. Given the climate of liberal indoctrination, and how much women ostensibly have to lose from admitting they prefer male bosses, these numbers are striking. Other surveys have come up with similar results, as is mentioned in Steve Moxon's book The Woman Racket. There are good women bosses, of course, but overall women take office politics more personally; they are less straight-forward than men and more emotional. They tend to find decision making and authoritative action stressful, which is why some become raging shrews in positions of command. This is natural. Women are pacifists, not warriors. The interpersonal approach of women generally does not lend itself to leadership. Women are made to nurture, not command.

IN THE DISCUSSIONS this week about a man who said it was difficult to find a woman who didn’t already have a child by another man, I answered that I thought it might be possible for him to find a decent wife who was a single mother. However, in the heat of the conversation I failed to clarify one aspect of my position. I don’t think a woman who has refused to marry the father of her child, as Bristol Palin has done, or who has divorced the father of her child fits into the category of suitable prospects.

In years past, men who did not want to marry the women they impregnated were compelled to, largely by other men. That is no longer the case. Naturally, I don’t view marriage to single mothers as an answer to the cultural dilemma of men. There is no answer to their cultural dilemma that falls short of the restoration of patriarchal values, the return to traditional sex roles, and the end of the sexual revolution. 

(more…)

    LOU LUMENICK writes in The New York Post about the new movie based on Elizabeth Gilbert's paean to female narcissism: A year-long, around-the-world quest for self-fulfillment that basically goes nowhere, Eat Pray Love is a very shallow, very glossy 2½-hour travelogue starring a miscast Julia Roberts as a spoiled, self-centered divorcée who decides to get away from it all. Though it’s based on a hugely popular, Oprah-endorsed memoir by Elizabeth Gilbert, there’s little in the script or in Roberts’ wrongheaded Big Movie Star Performance to explain why, in the space of six months, Elizabeth dumps both her husband of a decade (Billy Crudup) and a younger actor/yogi (James Franco), both of whom adore her. Most likely she’s bored, a sentiment that will likely be felt most acutely by guys dragged to see this overproduced, self-congratulatory collage of New Age-y clichés.  

  HERE'S a video of the Victory over Japan celebration in Honolulu on August 14, 1945. There's no burning cars or looting, just joy and sailors cruising through the beautiful streets of downtown Waikiki before they were transformed by high-rise towers and designer boutiques.

READER N. writes:

The discussion of unmarried women and their children has been interesting. But in the real world, yet another powerful woman, Jennifer Aniston, has yet again declared fathers to be totally unnecessary. I’ve heard this notion for so many years, that I no longer notice it, so when this interview was given I just ignored it, until someone brought it to my attention. You may or may not find it useful.

Excerpt:

“”Women are realizing it more and more knowing that they don’t have to settle with a man just to have that child,” Aniston, 41, said. “Times have changed and that is also what is amazing is that we do have so many options these days, as opposed to our parents’ days when you can’t have children because you have waited too long.” (more…)