
I NOTICED in the news that “Pope” Leo XIV took time from his busy schedule to meet with families of the devastating fire at a ski resort bar on New Year’s Eve in Crans-Montana, Switzerland.
Forty young people were killed and more than 100 experienced severe injuries in the most horrible way after the bar exploded into flames. A sparkler held high by a young waitress sitting on someone’s shoulders touched the ceiling and all of the bar’s flammable materials ignited at once. Here is a news story that is all too tragically true. The faces of the families cannot hide their real grief. The photos of the victims are not professionally staged. There is no government political agenda or call to disarm citizens.
Presumably Leo was offering genuine sympathy, not conspicuous compassion for the cameras. Though a true pope, in the case of a tragedy such as this, would presumably offer private and not public sympathies, given the nature of the bar celebration, I do not doubt the sincerity of Leo’s sympathy. He is generally a restrained and dignified figure, especially in comparison to the scattershot vulgarity and coarseness of his predecessor, Francis.
There was nothing objectionable in Leo’s consoling remarks to the families of victims. Well, wait a minute, yes, there was:
Dear brothers and sisters, nothing will ever be able to separate you from the love of Christ (cf. Rom 8:35), nor your loved ones who suffer or whom you have lost.
On this score, “Pope” Leo is not one to offer consolation. He and his brothers in theological revolution have caused incalculable harm to souls and separation from the love of Christ. Apostasy, heresy and other sins against divine commandments can separate us from the love of Christ. While it is not true that there was no hope for these young victims, the conciliar revolutionaries who have taken over the Catholic Church have made that hope much less realistic for people the world over, as the graces that flowed from the Catholic Church’s teachings and Holy Sacraments have been lost to them.
So far, Leo’s brief tenure has been a series of unconvincing assurances that the revolution has been good. In this regard, as Thomas Droleskey points out, he is similar to the late Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev in his address to the 26th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) on February 23, 1981. (more…)