EVERY day of the week in America, people are sadly killed in violent crimes.
These ordinary deaths usually receive no intense media coverage lasting for days on end. The public is not pummeled with the details, almost as if they were being systematically traumatized themselves. There are no instantaneous public expressions of grief by politicians or community-wide, televised candlelit vigils. There are no immediate calls on national television for legislative action and new security measures. These crimes often involve reckless or inexpert use of guns. There are no socially awkward and clumsy teenagers displaying the sort of Rambo-style marksmanship even highly-trained and fit members of the military would find difficult to replicate.
As I learned in the years when I was a newspaper reporter covering violent crime, family members and witnesses are devastated. They sometimes cry uncontrollably. They can barely speak or talk coherently. They experience intense shock, particularly if they have witnessed violence and bloodshed. They cannot put into words their trauma or fear in the very first moments after a violent crime, let alone smile repeatedly, as the famous Robbie Parker did at a nationally publicized press conference after his daughter was allegedly gunned down in a quiet, suburban school, just before the president interrupted his schedule and flew in for photo ops.
Always ask yourself when a big story emerges with lots of accompanying political hoopla, “Does anyone benefit?” and “Is my instinctive compassion being manipulated?”
Guns can be put to bad (murder) or good (self defense) use. But lies, especially systematic lies, are never good and can break the moral compass of a society. Terrorizing millions of children with mass coverage of allegedly horrifying crimes in schools is child abuse. My interest in this subject is primarily motivated by concern for the psychological damage done by terror propaganda.
Since the Obama administration (see video below), it has been lawful in the United States for the federal government to engage in domestic propaganda events (i.e., public deception) to combat “extremism.” Given this documented fact, it is not absurd or ridiculous for some to claim that, due to strange anomalies in certain events, the government is doing just that or that generously compensated citizens would participate in deception and even consider their participation virtuous, especially given that it is legal.
Any one or two of these phenomena at a crime scene would not be alarming or prove anything. Many or all of them appearing together is a serious problem and suggests political propaganda with an agenda of stoking fear and enacting legislative gun restrictions or security measures.
Here are some signs of a staged event:
** No clear or convincing imagery of actual attack despite the presence of dozens or hundreds of cell phones
** Immediate, pervasive, non-stop media coverage
** Victims killed instantly despite the advanced state of medical treatment for gunshot wounds
**Victims declared dead without being taken to the hospital
** Active shooter drills conducted in vicinity same day or not long before
** Witnesses say they thought it was a drill
** Lack of normal emergency response; victims often not taken to hospital
** Relatives fail to exhibit normal shock and trauma; speak as if reciting a script; laugh and smile
** Journalists ask leading questions and coach witnesses
** Police or ambulance staff stand around or mill about at scene without urgency; no sign of actual bloodshed
** Flashing lights and sirens suggest chaos and emergency scenario, but no scenes of actual carnage
** Federal or state officials quickly on the scene
** Politicians instantly call for legislative action
** Alleged perpetrator identified right away though normally it would take hours or days
** Death of perpetrator
** Highly implausible marksmanship; one in a million chance that anyone could shoot that accurately
** Contradictory details by alleged witnesses
** Manifesto by perpetrator
** Lack of convincing blood or wounds on surviving victims
** Photos of shoes at scene (Masonic symbolism)
** Empty chairs, clothes or discarded personal items at scene suggest chaos and create dramatic imagery
** Immediate identification of victims though normally it would take hours for journalists or police to collect and release information
** Wounded victims able to communicate and smile soon after attack despite grave injuries, defying all known medical norms
** Maudlin, seemingly-scripted details about victims, described as caring people
** Candlelit vigils, teddy bears, heart placards and “Strong” memes
** “We’re-all-in-this-together” language
** Scant information about victims’ past available on Internet
** Victims not on Social Security Death Index
** Initial video footage disappears
** Internet videos documenting staging censored
** No photos of actual carnage or convincing bloodshed on the Internet afterward though scenes of other crimes are easily available
** Victims valorized for weeks to the point of maximum emotional saturation of the public
** Masonic numbers, especially 3, 9, 6, 11, 33, 66
** Unquestioning adherence to script by journalists
** Immoral relationships, clownish stupidity and ridiculous outfits exhibited by witnesses, seemingly mocking viewers
** Deaths never independently verified
** Gofundme accounts benefit from intense publicity
— Comments —
Robert Robbins writes:
I don’t know if the latest shooting in Georgia this week actually happened, but I do see a comment here either way after watching a brief interview with a boy who supposedly lived to tell about whatever happened. As you have documented before in similar interviews post-horrific episodes, the boy is literally smiling the entire length of the interview, with flippant arm gestures (throwing arms up in the arm), which is precisely what you don’t do after an encounter as traumatic as that. Your whole body is weighed down by the stress of it and you are emotionally and physically exhausted. This young lad is smiling and seemingly ready to hit the pizza shop for a bite to eat.
“I was just like kinda scarred.”
If it did actually happen, I am perhaps more horrified that young people are so divorced from reality that their emotions cannot work for them to understand the trauma and tragedy. It is one thing for someone to be ignorant, since that is our natural beginning state, as we are born with a tabula rasa, but it is another thing for people to be apathetic to this degree or, worse still, to manifest the contrary and normal and healthy emotional state like fear, sadness, or just tiredness. Someone who laughs or smiles or is overall light hearted talking about a tragedy like shooting children is either a demoniac or a psychopath or both.
Mr. Robbins adds:
To the point, informative, and intriguing, your post was very good to help shine light on the mass shooting phenomenon. I had no idea hoaxes were a lawful thing now.
The world is so crazy, one is hard pressed not to become insane a little just trying to follow it. Perhaps therein lies the secret–don’t follow the world.
Laura writes:
Great point: Follow the world and and fall into lies.
So sad that people desire manufactured distractions. That’s the heart of it all.
Alan writes:
Whether “mass shootings” are real events or hoaxes is a valid question but a secondary point. As you note, there are good reasons to conclude that some or many such incidents are staged. But either way, they are a most convenient pretext for another propaganda barrage and for Do-Gooder entities to crawl out of the woodwork.
“Gun control” and “mental health” are codewords for surrendering more and more power to government and to “public-private partnerships”, which is code for Communist Government. Either way, limitless government will come out on top, while individual rights, personal responsibility, the right to bear arms, and the administration of law by means of objective standards and rules are to be extinguished sooner or later, as Tyrannical Government may decide. We can be certain that it is all carefully planned, scripted, and rehearsed.
Laura writes:
A moratorium on all publicity surrounding these events would help solve the problem, but that’s not even remotely possible.
Kathy G. writes:
The idea that it is a legitimate/legal government function to lie to and terrorize it’s own citizens with propaganda and shooting/pandemic hoaxes is simply monstrous, and should completely erase any lingering notion that we live in any kind of a “representative” system. This is all very old strategy, the ancient “Problem-Reaction-Solution”, the first historical reference of it that I know of being Diocletian burning down his own palace in order to blame and punish the early Christians. Nearly daily now, I learn of some historical event I was taught that was in reality something else entirely, or some new “crisis”, incident, or impending doom-prophecy. The Great Deceiver has been very active in the past several hundred years, and secrets are being revealed. Being grounded in Christ, Scripture, and Faith is such a help. I can’t imagine not having that, and trying to make sense of all of this and understand reality.
Janice writes:
Another aspect of these events comes to mind: the possibility of the pre-planning of the abduction of children from these places so they can be trafficked – afterward falsely reported as being killed? Maybe my imagination is in overdrive, but that could be one more motivation behind these stagings. Faking crimes is diabolical to begin with, so its not as if those responsible for it are incapable of it! Unless logistics would somehow prevent it, these ” crime scenes” would lend perfect cover for such activities.
Laura writes:
I hadn’t thought of that. Anything’s possible, but I think the success of these things depends on parents not losing their children. It’s unlikely any parent would remain quiet if a child’s body disappeared.
Another interesting video about these events: