{"id":100061,"date":"2017-03-27T14:07:46","date_gmt":"2017-03-27T18:07:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thinkinghousewife.com\/wp\/?p=100061"},"modified":"2017-03-28T00:05:49","modified_gmt":"2017-03-28T04:05:49","slug":"how-to-silence-free-thought","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thinkinghousewife.com\/2017\/03\/how-to-silence-free-thought\/","title":{"rendered":"How to Silence Free Thought"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"first\"><strong>FROM\u00a0<\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.lairdwilcox.com\/news\/defame.html\">an essay by Laird Wilcox<\/a>, &#8220;The Practice of Ritual Defamation: How values, opinions and beliefs are controlled in democratic societies:&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><i>Defamation<\/i> is the destruction or attempted destruction of the reputation, status, character or standing in the community of a person or group of persons by unfair, wrongful, or malicious speech or publication. For the purposes of this essay, the central element is defamation in retaliation for the real or imagined attitudes, opinions or beliefs of the victim, with the intention of silencing or neutralizing his or her influence, and\/or making an example of them so as to discourage similar independence and &#8220;insensitivity&#8221; or non-observance of taboos. It is different in nature and degree from simple criticism or disagreement in that it is aggressive, organized and skillfully applied, often by an organization or representative of a special interest group, and in that it consists of several characteristic elements.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<i>Ritual Defamation<\/i> is not ritualistic because it follows any prescribed religious or mystical doctrine, nor is it embraced in any particular document or scripture. Rather, it is ritualistic because it follows a predictable, stereotyped pattern which embraces a number of elements, as in a ritual.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p><center>The elements of a <i>Ritual Defamation<\/i> are these:<\/center><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">\u00a0In a <i>ritual defamation<\/i> the victim must have violated a particular taboo in some way, usually by expressing or identifying with a forbidden attitude, opinion or belief. It is not necessary that he &#8220;do&#8221; anything about it or undertake any particular course of action, only that he engage in some form of communication or expression.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">The method of attack in a <i>ritual defamation<\/i> is to assail the character of the victim, and never to offer more than a perfunctory challenge to the particular attitudes, opinions or beliefs expressed or implied. <i>Character assassination<\/i> is its primary tool.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">An important rule in <i>ritual defamation<\/i> is to avoid engaging in any kind of debate over the truthfulness or reasonableness of what has been expressed, only condemn it. To debate opens the issue up for examination and discussion of its merits, and to consider the evidence that may support it, which is just what the <i>ritual defamer<\/i> is trying to avoid. The primary goal of a <i>ritual defamation<\/i> is <i>censorship<\/i> and <i>repression<\/i>. [<a href=\"http:\/\/www.lairdwilcox.com\/news\/defame.html\">cont.<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px; text-align: center;\">&#8212; Comments &#8212;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>Bruce B. writes:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">I saw this quote by Noam Chomsky in an article at VDARE: \u201cThe smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum \u2013 even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there\u2019s free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>FROM\u00a0an essay by Laird Wilcox, &#8220;The Practice of Ritual Defamation: How values, opinions and beliefs are controlled in democratic societies:&#8221; Defamation is the destruction or attempted destruction of the reputation, status, character or standing in the community of a person or group of persons by unfair, wrongful, or malicious speech or publication. For the purposes [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-100061","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thinkinghousewife.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100061","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thinkinghousewife.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thinkinghousewife.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thinkinghousewife.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thinkinghousewife.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=100061"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.thinkinghousewife.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100061\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":100071,"href":"https:\/\/www.thinkinghousewife.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100061\/revisions\/100071"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thinkinghousewife.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=100061"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thinkinghousewife.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=100061"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thinkinghousewife.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=100061"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}