THE Washington, D.C. Office of Human Rights has launched a campaign promoting sensitivity toward the transgendered, “the first government-sponsored campaign in the country to focus on the treatment of transgender and gender non-conforming communities,” according to the New York Daily News. 

The print ads portray “gender non-conforming communities,” or the sad and perverted process of pretending to be the opposite sex, as cool and exciting, and caution people to treat the transgendered with “courtesy and respect.”

At the same time, the school district of Cranston, Rhode Island has decided to prohibit its father-daughter dances.  A single mother complained through the ACLU that the events were discriminatory because not every child has a father to attend.

Under liberalism, the low must be exalted and the high debased. And the distinctiveness of the sexes must be constantly denied. We are all part of a gender non-conforming community now.

Jeanette V. , who sent the D.C. photos from the website Buzzfeed, writes:

Our tax money at work. The sad thing is these people stand out in a crowd. They look like freaks. If I was a parent with children and someone showed up to a public place looking like this I would quietly leave.

— Comments —-

Buck writes:

Themis, the Greek goddess of blind justice, was the personification of divine or natural law, the natural order of being, and justice. The three damaged creatures depicted here personify the nature of modern liberalism; a denial and defiance of natural law, a socially constructed disordering of being, and of course, social justice.

James P. writes:

Jeanette thinks those people look like freaks. I agree. By DC standards, however, those transgendered folk are relatively normal looking, and I have no doubt the photos were staged to make them look as normal as possible.

L.C. writes:

I follow a midwife on Facebook because she offers a rather pragmatic approach to midwifery (I had my first in a birthing center, and my second at home). From what I have gathered on her blog, she met her “partner” at a La Leche League meeting, left her husband for this woman, and years later her lesbian partner has had multiple surgeries to make herself look like a man.

All this is to preface a post she put up today on Facebook.

She was asked, “Did you decide how many kids to have or was the decision made for you? How did you figure out when you were going to be done?

To which she responded: “For me: I would have had tons of kids. I loved having babies, was a really great mom of babies and little kids. But, meeting Zack (who was presenting as a woman) when Aimee was 2 days old took care of any more easy procreation and we just never had any money to do the more expensive getting-pregnant things. We thought about a baby seriously 11 years ago, but (obviously) decided no… and now are sooooo glad we did. It is SO much fun being grandparents; would be much more difficult being parents at this age (I don’t know how people do it). While I’m sad the decision was taken away from me, in a way, it turned out for the best. (I guess I have to look at it that way, right?)

The idea that she had no choice in whether or not to have more children is more than a little preposterous–you do, after all, choose your partner (though, I suppose, not whether or not you’re madly in love with that person). Nonetheless, the decision was not taken from her. She chose.

Laura writes:

So two women who have just given birth meet in a breastfeeding club and …

Some things are too weird to think about. Let’s file this under, “Things Are Falling Apart Very Quickly.”  As Lawrence Auster put it,  the human mind is meant to contemplate reality, not insanity.

Please follow and like us: