BUCK writes:

Nine year-old twins Zea and Luna introduced President Barack Obama at the White House’s LGBT Pride Month celebration last Thursday.

The two girls took turns reading from their prepared notes:

We wrote a letter to the president last summer (they were age eight) and asked him to make some changes. First we asked him to make it harder for bad guys to get guns…(smiles and nods), second for more funding for art and libraries…and PE…(quiet nod from the president) and third, we ask the president for his support of gay marriage.(the crowd goes nuts.They erupt with hoots and screams. The president motions for calm and says “we’re almost done”) because we have two moms and they are just as good as other parents. They love us a lot.

Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States.

Did these nine-year old girls (eight when they wrote the letter) conceive of the idea to write to the president, and conceive of the questions by themselves? Of course not. Are they well versed on the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment and the current plethora of gunslaws? How about school funding and the importance of art and exercise for eight years olds? Certainly these cute little girls know all about homosexuality, procreation, evolution, and the full range of moral and civilizational issues facing our dying country. Certainly they do.

Here’s a 2004 story about the girls and their captors: Lara Weiss and her partner, Nora Wynne.

What distinguishes the actions of the young girls from a bout of Stockholm Syndrome? I’m sure that they have not been threatened, abused, or intimidated. I’m sure that the two moms love them as properly as two lesbians can. But, the two girls are held captive. Their everyday experience is one of cooperation. It’s really no different than a normal family, is it? Except that as they age they learn that having two moms is unusual; that the other girls that they know have one mom and a dad. This has to be explained. We can all imagine how it would have to be handled. It’s not one and done, a simple question and answer. This is going to take some time and some studied effort. It has to be done right.

Moms and dads don’t have to go through that. They live it. They don’t have to justify it or rationalize it or persuade. In a normal family it just reveals itself, for the most part.

When the hostages were held for 131 hours by those machine-gun carrying criminals in that Stockholm bank in 1973, they had a distinct cognitive and psychological advantage over two young, perhaps infant girls. They knew what they were in for, yet they still succumbed to their captors. They actually came to believe that the criminals were their protectors, that the robbers who tied them up and strapped explosives to them were going to protect them from the police. They had the judgment and experience of adults. Much later, after it was over, they learned about what had happened to them; that they had emotionally bonded with the very people who least had their well-being in mind.

— Comments —-

Texanne writes:

Children purchased at the fertility lab, now being used as political tools — just like their father, who was never a human person — used only for his sperm.  If Father’s Day might hurt their feelings, I guess it’s time to quietly retire it as an old fashioned, patriarchal, sexist tradition.  No men, no women, no “punishment” for Obama’s daughters’ mistakes, no father for Zea and Luna, only “planned and wanted” children — only endless love.

Laura writes:

Obama is the ultimate anti-father, standing in a room of lesbians celebrating cold and calculated fatherlessness.

It strikes me that Zea and Luna, the two girls who were used as props for political theater in the white house (no, I won’t capitalize it as a proper noun these days) to promote homosexual “marriage”, are products of eugenics. Most likely, the sperm which led to their conception was chosen from a carefully culled database of potential fathers. The sperm donors in this database were carefully screened for physical and psychological abnormalities and genetic diseases. In the database, these men were also categorized according to things like intelligence, skin color, eye color, height, and weight. Undesirable characteristics such as male-pattern baldness were likely selected against.

Liberals are the first ones to scream “racist!” whenever someone has the temerity to mention that intelligence is strongly heritable, or even that intelligence is at all heritable. Whenever someone mentions the importance of IQ or its heritability, liberals usually go on unhinged diatribes about how this kind of thinking leads straight to eugenics and then, a few short steps later, the holocaust. Yet in the process of selecting a sperm donor, intelligence, ethnicity, and looks are prime factors in this cold, calculated selection process. Contradiction? Oh, well. I guess no one has ever claimed that liberalism is a logically self-consistent system of thought.

Of course, I could be wrong. The other possibility is that instead of using a sperm bank, the lesbians sought the sperm of a male friend of theirs (often a homosexual male), which I understand is the other common way for lesbians to conceive.

Please follow and like us: