Sonia and Sarah

  It is interesting to contrast and compare two of the most prominent women in American politics this summer. They are dramatically different figures.  Let's leave aside their sharply differing political views for a moment. It's interesting to look at these women simply as models for women. What do they have to say to the young women of America about their hopes and dreams? Sonia Sotomayor is far less dangerous in this respect than Sarah Palin. Sotomayor has justified her radically feminist speeches on the ground that they were purely inspirational. She was trying to motivate young women and Hispanics to succeed in the tough realm of law. This is a poor defense for her remarks and no disavowal of the content of the speeches. But, the question here is this. Is she truly inspirational? Sotomayor is the sort of woman whose life speaks honestly to women who wish to reach the pinnacles of law. It shows what sacrifices are involved. Sotomayor is divorced and has said publicly that her work contributed to the break-up of her marriage. She has no children. She is manly in manner and appearance. Young women look at Sonia and realize that they must make real choices. In other words, she is inspirational, but only to those willing to pay the inevitable costs. Sarah, however, offers an image that is an illusory bargain. She has five children, a handsome husband, a pretty face, and a feminine style. Young women look at Sarah and think, "Ambition carries no price. I can have…

Comments Off on Sonia and Sarah

The Symbolism of Sarah

  Sarah Palin is not simply a personality. She is an idea. From the moment she stepped through the gates of national politics, she presented herself as a normal all-American mom. People went gaga. The hockey mom routine was a sensation. They roared with approval, not just at the convention but all across the country in the aftermath of her speech. It struck a chord because of what it said about women. They can be aggressive and maternal with no inherent contradiction between the two. Things are not as bad as they seem! People who reject her for reasons other than, or in addition to, her political inexperience know this is a dangerous illusion.

Comments Off on The Symbolism of Sarah

Why Women Should Not Lead

  In light of the renewed discussion of Sarah Palin, I offer a short, politically incorrect list of the reasons why women should not hold the reins of power, even at levels less significant than the presidency:  Women, even highly intelligent women, are more emotional than men.  Women govern with ideas of nurturing. Society functions on notions of duty and discipline.  Women have too much to do in the private realm.  The future depends on the child-rearing of today.  Birth rates sharply fall under egalitarian leadership.  Men lose interest in fields dominated by women. The more women govern, the less men seek to govern.  Female public figures are judged more than men on their physical appearance.  Women who hold power tend to disparage the powerlessness of most women, making it difficult for women in general to forsake ambition for greater goods.

Comments Off on Why Women Should Not Lead

Sarah-nades

  Many patriotic Americans are madly in love. They're madly in love with Sarah Palin. Sarah will break the stranglehold of the Washington elites. She will stick up for nation and family. She will be to the GOP what Obama is to the Democrats. Only read the comments on this column at American Thinker to get a sense of all that is riding on Sarah. It's gotten to the point where the more Sarah disqualifies herself from higher office, the more popular she becomes. Sarah has just betrayed the voters of Alaska by leaving her elective office. She has resigned for no reason other than that she wishes to explore better possibilities for herself. She appeared afterward at a July Fourth parade in Juneau, smiling with daughter Bristol and her baby at her side. All along, she has taken the view that the more publicly she flaunts her daughter's private life, the more acceptable it will be. She has offered no compelling reason to support her candidacy for national office other than her identification with Red State America. Yet, her supporters view everything Sarah does as an act of wisdom and idealism. Why don't they see it as ambition? For a simple reason. They are in love. Love is mad. Love is irrational. Love is often self-destructive.

Comments Off on Sarah-nades

Mulshine on Sarah

  Paul Mulshine of the Newark Star-Ledger is one of the few journalists in America who offers clear-eyed commentary on Sarah Palin, with neither the infatuation of the right or the venom of the left. He says: "What makes someone who has never won election before a polity bigger than Bergen County's think she could handle the most power[ful] job on the planet? Whatever it is, it's not pretty - though she certainly is. But if she had a bit less ambition and a bit more humility, Palin would realize that without her looks she wouldn't have appeared on the national political scene in the first place."  

Comments Off on Mulshine on Sarah