ONE often finds when Jewish people react to public criticism that they instantly claim they are being exposed to “Jew hatred” or “hateful” statements. This reaction — this use of the word ‘hate’ — is used by the powerful Anti-Defamation League all the time and thus is taught and reinforced by Jewish leaders.
This word “hate,” I maintain, is a rhetorical weapon. You might even say it is a case of projection and at times represents not hatred of Jews, but hatred by Jews.
Let’s unpack it for a moment.
To criticize someone is not necessarily to hate him. If my neighbor were to pull up with a dump truck and deposit a load of gravel at the end of my driveway, I would be very angry and would definitely criticize his conduct. But would that mean that I hated my neighbor?
When a parent scolds a child who has misbehaved, does the parent hate the child?
When a person walking down the street pulls the leash of a dog firmly to keep him away from someone else’s dog, does the dog-owner hate the dog?
When a surgeon deliberately cuts a person in the operating room, does he hate the patient?
When a doctor informs you that you are not healthy, does he hate you?
Resisting someone or giving him bad news is not necessarily hating him.
The use of the word “hate” by the ADL and others has these effects:
** It conveys the idea that anyone criticizing Jews is motivated by emotion, and not hard-cold facts.
** It conveys the idea that critics of Jews are irrational, dumb and bestial.
** It conveys the idea that Jews are under imminent threat, which comes in handy when boosting a public image of victimhood (and seeking federal dollars for security)
** It makes ordinary Jews afraid and thus more likely to cling submissively to Jewish leaders and organizations, as well as fund them.
** It encourages Jewish egocentrism, making Jews think they are so important as to dominate the emotional lives of others.
** It reinforces, as mentioned above, the sense of moral superiority that comes with public victimhood.
** It encourages those non-Jews filled with weak-minded vanity in regard to their own oh-so-loving natures to grovel before Jews, in efforts to prove they are not dumb, “hateful” brutes. (This constant kissing of the Jewish tush is quite despicable and I am confident that if I were Jewish I would much rather a bit of honest “hatred.” But thankfully, God did not make me Jewish because if He did I would have been run out of the synagogue — especially the secular synagogue, which is vastly more powerful than the religious one. In visceral revolt against a world of self-serving propaganda, I would have been branded a “self-hating Jew” a long, long time ago. Here again, it would boil down to charges of “hate,” “hate,” “hate!” Oh, don’t you hate the word!)
The most convenient thing about accusing others of hatred is that it’s an unfalsifiable charge. The accused can never prove or disprove the accusation, hatred being entirely invisible. Accusing someone who is criticizing you of hatred moves the discussion from the observable to the unobservable and thus can amount to a clever rhetorical strategy of evasion. Those of Christian sensibility are especially disarmed by the charge, being prone to the vanity mentioned above. Charges of “hate” are thus heaped relentlessly upon their scrupulous heads.
In conclusion, the word “hatred” is used by Jewish leadership to control Jews and exploit them, as well as to bully non-Jews who are neurotically afraid more than anything else of appearing “hateful.” The truth of the matter is that not all that many people hate Jews. At least, that’s my observation, after years of studying the issue. I certainly don’t hate them. I can’t prove that in words but I have proved it over and over again in private actions. My conscience is at peace in this regard. “I will never forget the kindness you have shown to me,” a Jewish friend once said. Though I never criticized her personally, sometimes to criticize others is to love. If you were walking in front of an oncoming vehicle and I yelled out, “Stop!,” would that be hateful of me?
As for the idea of “inciting” hatred of Jews by publicly criticizing them — here we have another bogeyman and some definite projection. The people who endlessly incite hate accuse others of doing so. In fact, the opposite is true when it comes to criticizing them. If decent people do not criticize Jewish power, the frustration that wells up over certain realities can only result in extreme anger. Not to criticize Jewish influence and power over our daily lives when a person is aware and equipped to do so at this moment in American history is to incite hatred.
The more Jews accuse others of hatred, the more anger they may engender. Anti-Semitism is very, very useful to Jewish leaders. What a racket.
It’s not right to hate, but it is also not right — indeed it may be a grave slander — to make glib and false accusations of hatred where none exists. Accusing an innocent person of hatred may even engender hatred.
One other thing: Given the extent and reach of Jewish propaganda, this use of the word “hate” has become nauseatingly boring. Aren’t you sick to death of it? Can a charge that has become such a pervasive cliché continue to persuade or have any power at all? I sure hope not. ‘Hate’ has no home here, except when it comes to hating ‘hate.’
— Comments —
Kathy G. writes:
I loved your post on hate, so many great insights! This strange war on hate has never made sense to me. Besides being an obvious violation of free speech rights, it presumes the right to dictate thought, and is now codified into selectively applied “law”. There is righteous hatred of evil, and evil things. To insist that hate itself is evil…except when Jews and their fellow White haters freely express venomous hatred, is illogical. This springs out of “Judeo-churchianity”, where jews decide what is Christian and what isn’t, dictate what Christians think, and deceived Christians bow to them, and worry about offending and not being nice. It’s especially galling that Materialist marxists appoint themselves as arbiters of Christian morality. And that is what is going on, because marxists are atheists and moral relativists and have no objective standard by which to judge anyone as a hater, or who/what is hate-worthy. They are using Christian goodwill and guilt against them, and the hapless, nondiscerning Christians accept the bogus catechesis.
Holy Mother of God, pray for us.
Laura writes:
Thank you.
You’re right: this hatred of hate is a “bogus catechesis.” We have a duty to hate evil. Ah, dear hatred. Noble hatred. I love thee more and more every day!
