IN this interview I did a couple of days ago with Judith Sharpe at In the Spirit of Chartres, we discuss oddities in the story of the alleged assassination of Charlie Kirk and some of the implications. There is more to say, but we look at a few things not mentioned here in earlier posts.
Thank you, Mrs. Sharpe!
By the way, are you familiar with what ‘Turning Point’ means?
It apparently is a reference to the 1997 book The Fourth Turning: An American Prophecy by Neil Howe and William Strauss, and its 2023 sequel, The Fourth Turning Is Here. The authors, promoted by Steve Bannon, describe cycles of history:
According to the theory, historical events are associated with recurring generational personas (archetypes). Each generational persona unleashes a new era (called a turning) lasting around 21 years, in which a new social, political, and economic climate (mood) exists. They are part of a larger cyclical “saeculum” (a long human life, which usually spans around 85 years, although some saecula have lasted longer). The theory states that a crisis recurs in American history after every saeculum, which is followed by a recovery (high). During this recovery, institutions and communitarian values are strong. Ultimately, succeeding generational archetypes attack and weaken institutions in the name of autonomy and individualism, which eventually creates a tumultuous political environment that ripens conditions for another crisis. [Source]
It seems a mechanistic view of history, sort of New Age-y and gimmicky. Supposedly we are in a crisis period, but will see “order out of chaos.” Can’t wait. I guess this explains why Bannon, Elon Musk and others have been promoting civil war. (See here and here.)
I’m not a big fan of psychohistorians so I doubt I will ever read these books. They seem just the thing our Machiavellian rulers would read and discuss to figure out how best to control the masses.
— Comments —
Kathy G. writes:
I enjoyed your interview, and your continuing exposes of the inconsistencies of the whole false flag.
I recall watching the “second plane” hit the WTC, and was so shocked, only to realize that it was all a hoax when the towers were so obviously “pulled” via controlled demolition, demonstrations of which I had seen many times before on TV. I knew the George Floyd death was a hoax/staged by the odd behavior of Derek Chauvin, who seemed to be “playing to the crowd”, looking toward bystanders yelling at him, almost as if he were posing, and by the behavior of the paramedics who pulled up, loaded Floyd into their ambulance, and simply drove away, no sirens. They didn’t even check his pulse, much less begin CPR. I have never seen paramedics behave that way. We later learned both Floyd and Chauvin worked at the same nightclub, rumored to be a CIA front.
The many odd, inconsistent and downright wrong activities surrounding the Charlie Kirk incident are the same. The most bizarre thing is the number of people who simply accept the “narrative” as presented, despite the obvious flim flam. So many have no love of Truth.
Caryl J. writes:
I just listened to your interview with Judith Sharpe — very impressive. You have marshaled your facts and had many new and horrifying insights to share. It is hard to believe we live in such a corrupt time and place.
Thank you for your thoughtful and coherent account of what can only seem to be a scam of highest order.
