When the Times Has Nothing to Say
THE New York Times has published all of one paragraph on the Christopher Lane murder. I won’t bother to compare these few words with the reams of columns and news articles on the Trayvon Martin case because it’s all so obvious. This one paragraph was just enough to mention that the victim was in a “well-to-do” neighborhood while the accused came from the “gritty section of town.” Race was not mentioned at all.
Given the widespread coverage of the Lane murder elsewhere, I am surprised, however, that the Times has not run a piece stating that this case has prompted a “conversation” about race. Or perhaps a “conversation” about “gun control.” It is just about time for an article that amplifies the economic differences between the victim and the accused and makes sure everyone knows that one of the three was white. It’s time to explain to the world why the murderers were not to blame: the teens came from broken homes, they were poor, they did not have all the advantages of Christopher Lane and it was way too easy for them to acquire guns.
Someone is asleep at the switch. On the other hand, maybe this is wisdom. Sometimes the most effective propaganda is silence.
— Comments —
James P. writes:
The New York Times — when they talk, they’re lying, when they remain silent, they’re lying.





