To deprive a child’s or an adolescent’s brain from oxygen, or to restrict it in any way, is not only dangerous to their health, it is absolutely criminal. Oxygen deficiency inhibits the development of the brain, and the damage that has taken place as a result CANNOT be reversed.

The child needs the brain to learn, and the brain needs oxygen to function. We don’t need a clinical study for that. This is simple, indisputable physiology. Consciously and purposely induced oxygen deficiency is an absolutely deliberate health hazard, and an absolute medical contraindication.

— Dr. Margarite Griesz-Brisson MD, PhD 

— Comments —

William James T. writes:

And here I thought brain damage caused masks!

FROM Dr. Bruce Scott at Technocracy News and Trends:

On the 15th October 2020 the stark reality that we are being led by a psychotic Covidian cult narrative became even more evident; Nicola Sturgeon, the First Minister of Scotland, announced with great glee that couples marrying would no longer have to wear face masks when tying the knot. Of course, the Priest, Vicar, or Registrar etc conducting the ceremonies never had to wear a mask to conduct the marriage ceremony. What kind of political leader would impose on couples, who for all intent and purposes will be living together and spending the night together after the wedding, have to wear a mask during their wedding ceremony? Would a mask be required for the happy couple to consummate their marriage on their wedding night? Read More »

IT COULD have been worse.

Covid could have destroyed her make-up job.

ZENO writes:

Regarding your latest posts, a few brief observations:

Since Amazon, Netflix, Facebook, etc., seem to have benefitted enormously from Corona lockdowns, isn’t it obvious that it makes them interested in promoting “Corona” panic?

Bezos in particular has become the greatest “Corona King“, as locking people inside their homes and destroying small shops has benefited him enormously. He is also the owner of the Washington Post, which keeps publishing news about “corona panic.” Isn’t that a conflict of interest? Or are we supposed to think that it is just a coincidence, and not ask, “Cui bono”?

Regarding the elderly in the care homes, that breaks my heart. ““I’d rather die of Covid than loneliness.” What could be more sad than that? Read More »

AMY CONEY BARRETT is guilty of complicity in a lie.

She has clearly demonstrated, as we can see here, her lack of respect for the truth. A public official has much greater responsibility than the ordinary person.

The brutal truth is, no one in government is on our side. The black mask fits our leaders. They’re just highway robbers.

By the way, has the virus even been proven to exist?

Jon Rappoport writes:

The CDC document is titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It is dated July 13, 2020.

Buried deep in the document, on page 39, in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”

The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”

Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS. Read More »

KIT Knightly writes at Off Guardian (ignore warning; it is not dangerous to access this site):

The World Health Organization has finally confirmed what we (and many experts and studies) have been saying for months – the coronavirus is no more deadly or dangerous than seasonal flu.

The WHO’s top brass made this announcement during a special session of the WHO’s 34-member executive board on Monday October 5th, it’s just nobody seemed to really understand it.

In fact, they didn’t seem to completely understand it themselves. Read More »

SATIRE from The Babylon Bee:

WASHINGTON, D.C—President Donald Trump is once again under fire from the media for recklessly downplaying the danger of COVID by refusing to die. As the president begins to show signs of recovery, many worry that this sends the wrong message about the seriousness of the global pandemic.

“Every hour that he lives is another hour that the severity of this virus is undermined!” said reporter Sara Grace Major for CNN. “Why won’t he just DIE and show the American people how deadly this virus truly is?” Read More »

TO LEAVE this world at the age of 95 is no great tragedy.

But to spend one’s last months in intense loneliness — for no good reason — is a great tragedy.

Shame on all those people, including our presidential contenders, who have let many thousands die this way because of a flu that has killed about 10,000 people who were not already seriously sick.

By the way, I was in a restaurant yesterday and saw a sad sight. An elderly man walking down a ramp with a mask on fell to the ground. Fortunately, he was able to get to his feet and walk away. But he was very shaken.

Whether he fell because his vision was impeded by the mask, I don’t know, but I do know other people, not all of them old, have fallen because of masks. We see with our faces.

ABC News Trump heads to Walter Reed Hospital

THIRTY-three days before the election, The President is diagnosed with The Virus and is airlifted to Walter Reed Hospital, where he bravely battles for his life with “mild symptoms.” Operation Warp Speed has failed him. Never again can he be accused of not taking the global bug seriously.

In this latest episode of the reality TV show Pandemic, Trump is prevented from Making America Great Again for two weeks. His enemies openly cheer on the virus they have fanatically feared. Not known for their devotions, they are fervently praying now. His sparring partner, scheduled to meet him in the debating ring for another bout on Oct. 15, secretly wishes he could be hospitalized too. Scientists receive major grants to study whether Republicans are more susceptible than Democrats.

The Third Lady, also positively diagnosed, remains photogenically at the White House.

Stay Tuned for “Election Night,” the forthcoming episode when the recovered president, his ratings boosted by his dramatic illness and the resulting confidence that he can indeed lead the nation through the pending economic and social chaos, will win a second term. Read More »

LUCY writes:

You might find this interesting, although predictable.

Since I cannot meet my doctor, I e-mailed her office and asked for a phone consultation to do with my ongoing, but regulated, anemia. She called me from the privacy and comfort of her own home, getting paid the same as she would sitting in her office. Her call was tagged as “Private Call,” and I almost didn’t answer it.

I wrote in the e-mail that the masks were obstructing what I believe to be a normal flow of oxygen. I wore these masks religiously in malls and indoor public locations for about three months.

Recently I was feeling dizzy, which had previously been a symptom of my anemia.

During the conversation, this pleasant, intelligent, and dedicated doctor told me that I should wear the mask, but avoid going to public places as much as possible – i.e., just stay home. “Still wear your mask at all occasions” was her advice. Read More »

A GROUP of Very Important Scholars from Harvard, Northeastern University and Rutgers has delved into the topic of “misinformation” and Covid-19.

As part of the “COVID-19 Consortium for Understanding the Public’s Policy Preferences Across States,” the Very Important (and Very Well-Funded) Scholars, in the midst of a shattering global pandemic that has left bodies in the streets of every American city and town, not to mention cities and towns across the world, have risen above the catastrophic chaos and the all-pervasive fog of virus particles to examine surveys of the public to ascertain acceptance of supposedly common myths about “Covid-19:”

Scholars and public health officials have expressed growing alarm over what some have termed a “misinfodemic” − a parallel epidemic of misinformation − around COVID-19. Indeed, conspiracy theories, from the Plandemic pseudo-documentary to QAnon, fuel rising skepticism about scientific facts across many areas of public life, and in recent months especially with respect to COVID-19. Misperceptions, which can rapidly spread from obscurity to mass exposure via social media, may have the capacity to hinder the efficacy of public health efforts aimed at slowing the spread of the pandemic. Especially concerning, encountering false claims online may ultimately reduce the willingness of some Americans to get a COVID-19 vaccine when it becomes available. In this report, we assess respondents’ acceptance of 11 false claims that have circulated online since the beginning of the pandemic.

Here are the false claims that our Very Important Scholars studied:

Zoom in and look at the topics.

Not one is a serious challenge to the official narrative.

Not one is a really serious bit of “misinformation” that exposes the forced lockdowns for the breathtaking, global social engineering project they were — and still are.

Nowhere do we find the public’s reaction to “The Covid-19 death statistics are highly inflated” or “Hospitals received kickbacks for every Covid-19 diagnosis” or “Those who challenged the government were censored on the Internet” or “Masks cause physical harm” or “Less than 10,000 people have died of Covid-19 alone.”

Plandemic and QAnon — both examples of real misinformation projects — are mentioned but not what the mainstream media would falsely consider misinformation, such as the Bakersfield doctors or Dr. Annie Bukacek or Doctors for Truth.

Nice job, Very Important Scholars!

A report on misinformation and Covid-19 is a transparent exercise in misinformation.

FROM The Hill:

During a press conference Monday at the White House, the president pledged that a vaccine for the coronavirus would be available in “record time,” and swiped at [Kamala] Harris in particular over the remarks, calling her “the most liberal person in Congress.” Read More »

THE absurdities are getting absurder.

1619 Frans Hals, Catharina Hooft with her Nurse (Detail)

CHILDREN can’t always articulate their thoughts and feelings. We can use intuition, common sense, practical knowledge and memories of our own childhoods to understand them. While parents generally have the best of intentions in making their children wear face masks, many people have serious concerns about this practice for the following reasons:

Masks have no proven physical benefits for children themselves. (See CDC mortality figures by age.)

Masks diminish oxygen inhalation, cause wearers to breathe in carbon dioxide and could affect physical development of children.

Masks are uncomfortable and cause children to touch their faces more.

Masks are impractical because they get dirty during play.

Masks lower spatial visibility and could lead to more falls during play and while walking or running.

Masks make it difficult for children to communicate by word and facial expressions.

Masks are frightening, which is why they have often been used in occult rituals.

Masks create general insecurity about the ability of adults to protect.

Masks make it difficult to read the thoughts and intentions of adults.

Masks create an atmosphere of hostility and suspicion, which may affect the psychological development and hopefulness of children.

Masks make it hard for strangers to convey friendliness and good will to children.

Masks are habit-forming and some children will have trouble giving them up.

Masks cause obsessive worry about germs in some children. This paranoia may stay with them for many years.

Masks are ugly and children are sensitive to ugliness, which affects their spiritual development in deep and hidden ways.

Masks endanger childhood innocence by surrounding children with fears of death.

Leaving aside the incalculable, life-sustaining pleasure children’s faces give to adults, especially the frail elderly, as anyone who walks into a nursing home with a baby in her arms will instantly discover, it might be only a slight exaggeration to say that for children, faces are everything. Look at the way a calm baby fixates on the faces around him in a crowd as he looks over the shoulder of the person holding him. He seems to absorb every individual detail of the faces he sees. He does not look at the inanimate things around him. He does not look at clothes or hair. He looks at faces. He has a genius for reflecting on facial personality. What adults may consider an ugly or insignificant face, babies and very young children may find fascinating. They don’t live by the same standards of facial beauty that adults do. It’s individuality that matters to them, which we can know because they hone in on a new face. Babies are often frightened by a new face, but that’s because its individuality is overwhelming and they need time to get to know and trust it.

To tell a mother to wear a face mask while nursing her baby (and to stay six feet away from her newborn as much as possible), as the Centers for Disease Control has done, is a crime against the vulnerable young.

Imagine the little girl in the beautiful 17th-century painting above sitting on the lap of a nursemaid in a mask. Would she be so content and curious? Or would she be fretful and nervous?

Faces are the natural habitat of children, who in some ways live on a much higher spiritual plane than adults. They know the face is the seat of the soul. They are born with this knowledge: Faces are immortal and we cannot thrive or maintain good health without the faces of others. We are human beings, not automatons or biological weapons. Read More »

FROM “The G-20 Virus,” by Kevin Mugur Galalae (May 22, 2020):

Covid-19 is a political disease invented to accomplish the sustainability agenda, which has four overarching objectives: depopulation, decarbonization, globalization, and digitization.

First and foremost, the fake covid-19 pandemic is meant to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by greatly reducing the capacity and output of entire industries deemed nonessential, bankrupting tens of thousands of companies, putting half a billion people out of work, and subjecting the rest of the global population to severe economic uncertainty and duress; all of which will result in a much lower overall carbon footprint as a result of lower individual consumption patterns and thus a giant step forward towards a neutral carbon economy.

The fake pandemic provides the plausible deniability governments need to preserve the illusion of legitimacy and the rule of law while conducting a global program of industrial sabotage or creative destruction that will allow them to restructure the global economy according to the sustainability agenda and the decarbonization prerogative. This strategy is the hallmark of all covert methods of depopulation, which is now extended to also cover the decarbonization agenda.

Since the G-20 nations are responsible for the vast majority of greenhouse gas emissions, namely 74%, it falls upon them to make the greatest sacrifices in order to address this problem before the climate heats up by more than 1.5 degrees Celsius and the planet’s life support systems are damaged beyond repair.[Editor: This idea of catastrophic damage is not based in science.]

That the G-20 nations are indeed making the greatest sacrifices is revealed by the fact that they are registering the greatest number of covid-19 infections (83% of the global total) and deaths (92% of the global total), be they real or manufactured, which in turn allows them to cause the greatest economic damage to their own economies and thus the greatest reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.

As such, covid-19 should be renamed the G-20 Virus or the Decarbonization Virus.

Here is the data as of 22 May 2020 … (Scroll down the page. Download not necessary.) Read More »

SWISS PROPAGANDA RESEARCH has for months offered what appears to be fair and balanced analysis of the lethality, risks and treatment of Covid-19.

Here is the September update. This is a good resource, free of sensationalism.