“CHARLIE Kirk’s entire career was about manipulating American Christian values, flipping them on their head, [pressuring] people to believe the opposite of what right-wingers have always believed. At least, that was his main goal before October 7th, at which point he pretty much just only talked about Israel and how we have to support them genociding Gazans or we will have Sharia Law in America.”
GEMMA O’DOHERTY has a good piece on the Charlotte stabbing, “another race-baiting psyop to inflame racial tensions.”
You don’t have to deny the seriousness of black crime, to see this thing is “divide-and-conquer” distraction propaganda. She writes:
In the league of media fakery, the ‘Iryna Zarutska’ stabbing psyop is of such poor quality, it’s on a par with the epic Trump ear fail and the George Floyd hustle. I can’t breathe it’s so corny. At least this time, the bad actors involved remembered to release their ketchup capsules unlike Vax Daddy when he was being fake-assassinated. (more…)
I have some basic thoughts on how the alleged assassination of Charlie Kirk fits in with American tradition.
First let me ask, Who benefits? Why now?
The whole industry of false nationalism benefits from this event, an industry which more and more people are seeing through, especially after being so repeatedly betrayed by Donald Trump, who wouldn’t be where he is if the media had not so often attacked him, thereby making him seem somehow anti-establishment. The Republican Party, which has left the American people in the dust again and again, benefits. An assassination, endlessly discussed and promoted by the media, valorizes the victim and his cause. (more…)
Comments Off on Charlie Kirk and American Nationalism
THE LESSON of 9/11 is that an enemy wants your mind and heart. It wants to dazzle and traumatize you. It wants your thoughts and your capacity for compassion. It wants to drench you in emotion and fear. It wants your ability to reason and follow basic logic. After all, these are its greatest threats. (more…)
Carl and Betty Friedan divorced after 22 years of marriage. Carl vigorously disputed that he was abusive toward his wife.
[Reposted]
CARL FRIEDAN, the husband of feminist icon Betty Friedan, was so incensed by her claims that she was an abused spouse that he responded in a website of his own. (Carl, who worked in advertising, died in 2005 and Betty died in 2006). Here from that website is an account of an evening Carl and Betty spent together in 1966 when they were still married. I do not post this to gloat over Friedan’s personal problems or the sad state of their marriage, but as one bit of evidence that she was not the normal suburban housewife she claimed to be when she wrote her famous book The Feminine Mystique, published in 1963, and that her fanatical belief in ambition and the overthrow of traditional sex roles does not lead to human happiness. By the way, Betty admitted on national television that she had mischaracterized their marriage. From Carl’s account:
A really terrible episode occurred when in late summer of 1966 we made a weekend visit to my parents in Sharon, Mass. where my father had retired and established a four-acre blueberry farm. It was more of a hobby than anything else. And quite an attraction for his grandchildren. He would squint up at you with his good eye and show off his quarter-size blueberries with great pride. Nets covered about two acres of blueberry bushes. And a small third-acre pond, stocked with fish, was home to a small flat bottom rowboat.
The house, which he had built himself, was cramped and uncomfortable so this trip we stayed at a motel on Route 1, a main highway, about three miles from the farm. It was an old-fashioned kind of motel consisting of a row of small self-standing bungalows. Our two younger children, Emily and Jonathan were with us – they were then 10 and 14. (more…)
TRUMP cozies up to Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg and other schemers to discuss the technocratic Golden Age that Trump positively adores and that is the major objective of his presidency. (more…)
“ANOTHER murder ignored by the mainstream media: 22-year-old college student Logan Federico was murdered in Columbia, South Carolina, in May but no one heard about it.
“The suspect, Alexander Dickey, a 30-year-old career criminal with a history of nearly 40 prior arrests, allegedly broke into the home where Federico was staying and fatally shot her. (more…)
“PRESENT economic organization is intrinsically unjust for the same reason that it is ineffective and inefficient: the population never derives enough income from the production of the desired goods and services so as to be able to purchase that production in its entirety. The return for effort is much less that what it should be because the capacity to produce is not automatically balanced by the financial capacity to consume. (more…)
THE alleged stabbing of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska in Charlotte, North Carolina on August 25, 2025 is so obviously fake, it’s comical — or it would be comical if so many didn’t imbibe the news without discernment.
YEARS AGO, a friend from India, whose company I enjoyed, taught me invaluable lessons about Indian culture.
These brief doses of real life in the course of casual conversation were entirely unsolicited. At the time, I had only a rosy view of a country I had never visited and was unlikely ever to visit. Everyone from India was, to me, an exemplar of Gandhi-like detachment and homespun simplicity, my ideas being largely derived from movies. It’s not that these positive impressions are without basis in reality. Not at all. I have known genuine exemplars of this simplicity and detachment. But my friend taught me a bit about the underside of Indian character that was unknown to me.
I’M STILL working on fixes to this website so please disregard the confusing layout, but in the meantime I would like to warn you about a major news story — the alleged stabbing of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska, on the Lynx Blue Line light rail in Charlotte, North Carolina on August 22, 2025. This event appears to be just another case of staged propaganda.
The reasons why I say this:
The perpetrator is portrayed in videos by two different people, one a thin man in a red sweatshirt, the other a much bigger man in an orange sweatshirt.
No one on the train reacts, even when the perpetrator walks through the car with a dripping knife. If you can imagine what it would take to kill someone with a small pocketknife, what kind of struggle would ensue and how visible and alarming it would be to those less than three feet away, the failure of the passengers to look up even is an extreme implausibility. (more…)
“WE, Social Crediters, say that the monetary system does not reflect facts. The opposition says it does. Well, I put it to your common sense, how was it that a world which was apparently almost feverishly prosperous in 1929 — or alleged to be so, judged by orthodox standards — and certainly capable of producing tremendous quantities of goods and services and distributing a considerable portion of them, could be so impoverished by 1930, and so changed fundamentally that conditions were reversed and the world was wretchedly poor? Is it reasonable to suppose that between a single date in October, 1929, and a few months later, the world would change from a rich one to a poor one? Of course, it is not.” (more…)
Comments Off on Our Financial System vs. the Common Good
Into this high-strung, militant, and thoroughly rationalised civilisation of the Anglo-Saxon, with his heritage of laws and institutions evolved through centuries of struggle and presupposing the fighting spirit, the negro was thrust, against his will, and with instincts developed in a social, economic, and political setting totally different from that of the white. Deficient in the instinct for group organisation with a view to defence, he has never been a match for the white, even with everything in his favour, as the issue of the struggle between the Ku-Klux Klan and the Union League of Reconstruction days showed. He is handicapped, furthermore, by his inability to find his way through the maze of bewildering legal refinements and complex system of rights which are totally foreign to the negro race genius. Among these, however, the white feels himself entirely at home, for they are the legacy of his fathers, the expression of his group consciousness, and, therefore, the natural battle-ground for the bloodless gratification of his pugnacious instincts. No doubt the spirit of his race spoke through Professor Kelly Miller when he contrasted the “intolerant Teuton” and his militant individualism, Puritan ethics, and exclusive race pride, with the “amiable African” and his peaceful communism, his latitudinarian ethics, and almost entire absence of race pride.1 (more…)
Comments Off on The Gregariousness of Black Culture
