SINCE I have raised questions and criticisms of Charlie Kirk, I would like to balance these posts with this outstanding talk by him on the sexual revolution at an unknown campus in 2023.
He offers a clear and measured defense of virginity before marriage and he comes across as extremely likable.
It is a loss that he will no longer be doing this work and it is too bad that, regardless of what exactly happened on September 10, he was not remembered in a more respectful way than the political show that was his memorial service.
Charlie could be glib, arrogant and fanatical, which can be seen in this episode of his show in which he suggests televised executions of criminals, including political criminals, and this interview, where he jokes about the destruction of Gaza, but he spoke important truths about the sexual revolution and did it well.
— Comments —
A. writes:
I’ve been following your coverage of the Charlie Kirk assassination, and I think you’ve been on the money since day one. I appreciate you offering a balanced post today showing gratitude for some of the good things Charlie said, in this particular case, regarding the sexual revolution.
I’m of the opinion that Charlie Kirk was an intelligence asset from day one. These controlled opposition plants show a pattern of speaking the truth well after it would do any good to stymie the wound. Case in point would be Candace Owens being critical of Israel and Donald Trump after his election, once his power is already well consolidated. They pay lip service to off-railed trains, but do nothing to warn about what is coming down the tracks.
Thanks as always for your work, and God bless you.
Laura writes:
Thank you very much.
I’m inclined to think of him as controlled opposition with sincere convictions, some good and some bad.
Regarding the sexual revolution, good point. The damage has been done. Also, might they not want Christian Zionists to have a few more children for the team? The military needs eager men and women and there seems to be growing animus against it.
A. writes:
What you say about growing the Christian Zionist ‘team’ has a ring of truth in it. I could see that being an angle for giving a platform for traditional sexual morals.
