The Isolation of the Suburban Child of Wealth
HERE is a thesis that I cannot prove at this time, but I believe to be true:
Never in history have children of comfort and wealth experienced more physical isolation as a rule than do American children who live in large suburban mansions. In previous times, those who lived in mansions had servants. Their houses were generally filled with activity and people at all times. American individualism and egalitarianism abhor the hierarchical arrangements involved in domestic servitude though they do condone nannies and babysitters, who generally replace others rather than adding to the number of people in the home at any one time. In much of European history, ordinary people, even farmers, favored clustered villages, not individual houses on large tracts. It’s an anomaly that is opposed to the social nature of children, a subject to which the feminist woman is entirely indifferent, believing as she does that she should further the isolation of children by not even being home.
I thought of it this after reading about the very sad case of a Pennsylvania 13-year-old who left his family’s mansion, surrounded by their 13 acres, on an evening last week and committed suicide on the border of the property. Was he alone at the time? Would he have done the same thing if he had passed others on his way out the door? Would an encounter with even one other person who knew him have broken the spell of his self-absorption? (more…)





