SOCIALISTS don’t think much of housewives. Why should they? Housewives don’t do much for the cause. The worker bee can be raised in an institution.
Last week, Chairman Obama, promoting the Marxist scheme of cheap daycare for all, said:
“Moms and dads deserve a great place to drop their kids off every day that doesn’t cost them an arm and a leg. We need better child care, day care, early child education policies.”
Doesn’t it make you cringe to hear a politician refer to grown men and women as “moms and dads?” He added:
“Sometimes, someone, usually Mom, leaves the workplace to stay home with the kids, which then leaves her earning a lower wage for the rest of her life as a result. That’s not a choice we want Americans to make.”
No president, I believe, has ever so baldly endorsed feminist thinking on the vocation of housewife. Socialists collectivize homes. That’s what they do. They also promise things they can’t possibly deliver. Quality daycare is an oxymoron. Though it can never be delivered, it can always be dreamed of, to the point of actually believing that parents have the right to someone else raising their children cheaply.
American presidents did not always think so little of those who personally raise the next generation in their homes. Theodore Roosevelt, speaking in 1905, said: (more…)