AT Ladies Against Feminism, Marzina Reich wrote an excellent essay in 2004 of growing up in Poland under Communism, which encouraged a mass exodus of women from the home. She wrote:
All those ladies, overworked past exhaustion, were always complaining that husbands and children were not cooperative enough, did not help out enough, and really no one appreciated fully the load they were carrying. They all believed a strange theory that the way to balance their job and their home was through the children taking over the housework. (more…)
Ann Coulter writes that Asians support big government, gun control, and ‘affirmative action.’
Asians support big government because their culture places hierarchy above all, and because in their native countries, government is seen as the top of the hierarchy, and they themselves as subjects and clients of government. The concept of ‘citizen’ in the Western sense has no analogue in Asian culture.
They support ‘affirmative action’ because all Asian societies are tribal- and clan-based in nature, with extreme xenophobia present between tribes and clans, much less evinced towards those of other races and nationalities. Asians are so ‘racist’ that they make the KKK look like the NAACP; every single Asian I talked to about the election of 2008 was astonished that the U.S. would elect a black man as President, since in their view, blacks are subhuman.
Race-based preferences are endemic in all Asian societies, and always have been. All Asian countries reserve certain occupational specialities for natives, with additional considerations of patronage network membership, bribery, graft, and corruption.
The House Republican leadership yesterday came out with their hilariously-titled ‘principles’ for immigration reform. They are principles in the same sense that the defeated French generals established principles for their negotiations with the Wehrmacht in Compiegne.
Knowing that amnesty and the immigration surge was a clunker with the base, some 2016 “frontrunners” like Ted Cruz and Rand Paul shrewdly cast a meaningless, symbolic vote against the Schumer-Rubio bill and said a few critical words, while continuing to support the nonsensical idea that virtually unlimited immigration is a moral and economic good, just as long as it’s legal. Their disagreement with the Democrat desire to fundamentally transform the nation is as deep as a puddle. (more…)
HENRY McCULLOCH, a former Marine and Air Force Reserve fighter pilot, writes:
The Fools of Fox have no more sense about women in the armed forces than Barack Hussein Obama. Here’s Shep Smith last month introducing new Fox reporter Lea Gabrielle, a former Navy fighter pilot.
“Female fighter pilot” is an oxymoron on par with “Gay Marriage.” ‘Nuff said. Except that if you want to know what sort of lethal chicanery the U.S. Navy engaged in to get its precious “female fighter pilots,” simply google the names Kara Hultgreen (R.I.P.) and Carey Lohrenz, and if you want to know how force-feeding an unqualified woman pilot into a fighter squadron effectively destroyed a U.S. Air Force fighter wing, google the name Jackie Parker. As for what a success women in command at sea has been, please google the name Holly Graf.
My, my the world is turning, isn’t it? Ann Coulter is now saying the same things that Lawrence Auster said for years. His views and opinions earned him derision and dismissal from all the best people in society. Now the same insights are being declaimed in the mainstream media by a national columnist with mass approval and recognition.
From Coulter’s piece:
As House Republicans prepare to sell out the country on immigration this week, Phyllis Schlafly has produced a stunning report on how immigration is changing the country. The report is still embargoed, but someone slipped me a copy, and it’s too important to wait.
Leave aside the harm cheap labor being dumped on the country does to the millions of unemployed Americans. What does it mean for the Republican Party?
THERolling Stone, once the flagship of really cool people, weighs in with the latest liberal puff piece on “Pope” Francis. The magazine that loves Led Zeppelin and Pink Floyd pays Francis the ultimate compliment, comparing him more than once to that other spiritual leader of the Western world, Bill Clinton. According to writer Mark Binelli, who considers people like Newt Gingrich and Cardinal Timothy Dolan to be theological hard-liners, the homophobic, patriarchal, medieval organization that is the Catholic Church is finally seeing — a little bit — the error of its ways. Having put aside the “staunch traditionalist” Pope Benedict XVI, it has elected a hippy pontiff. Binelli understands the “pope” better than many supposed Catholics, who say Francis is constantly misinterpreted and didn’t really say what he just said.
Stay tuned. The Rolling Stone will soon be unveiling its translation of the New Testament on mobile app. Hear the good news about climate change, women’s ordination and transgender redemption. Learn how to be Catholic while hating everything the Church stands for.
IF YOU are under 30 and would like to buy a heath insurance policy (pre-existing conditions allowed) then I strongly recommend last night’s State of the Union address by President Barack Hussein Obama. He will lay out a few of the terms on a terrific policy. If, on the other hand, you are in the mood for a good cry about how wonderful America is because the average American will be getting a job soon (courtesy of the Republican Party) and the best and brightest from around the world will be getting jobs soon (courtesy of the Republican Party), I recommend Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers’s speech in response.
AT Crisis Magazine, there is a review by William Kirkpatrick of the movie Philomena. The movie, which I have not seen, is about an unwed teenager who gave birth to a boy in a Catholic convent in Ireland in the 1950s. The boy is later put up for adoption by the nuns. Kirkpatrick says the message of the film is out-of-date. The comment after the review by a reader named John O’Neill is worth noting (though I don’t agree with the last line):
The Irish past has become a whipping post for the modern American democrat/liberal; it is the example of the terrible conditions that the Church forced on the unsuspecting Irish. Frank McCourt’s Angela’s Ashes became a best seller among Americans especially Irish Americans because it dwelt on the horrible living conditions inflicted on the poor suffering Irish by the Catholic Church. Irish Americans love this version of their narrative history. In fact Ireland in 1955 was a very poor country and the parents of a pregnant teenage girl had no means to support her and the baby because in many cases they still had babies at home of their own. (more…)
Comments Off on Another Movie about the Evil, Evil Past
I thought this quote from a man whose daughter was seriously injured while skydiving, perfectly captures all that is wrong with the American father in our feminized society.
The girl’s parents agreed to let her perform the jump, but her father now says the skydiving company shouldn’t have allowed it.
TIBERGE at Galliawatch has numerous posts on Sunday's Jour de Colère, or Day of Anger, in Paris, a march by various traditionalist groups protesting the government of François Hollande. The organizers estimated a crowd of 160,000 people. However, the mainstream media contends there were about 17,000. Tiberge writes: If you are interested in the left-wing point of view of the demonstration that regards all the protesters as one form or another of Nazi degenerate, I suggest this article posted at NouvelObs, by journalist Giuseppe Di Bella, whose schadenfreude is surpassed only by his gloating: (…) A few thousand persons hit the Parisian sidewalks, Sunday afternoon from the place de la Bastille to the place Vauban, under high police protection. A veritable fiasco for an event carried by much of the media that turned out to be a pathetic parade by a not-very-illustrious representative sampling of a France that stinks of Pétainism and that brings shame to the Republic and its values.
I don’t know if your readership is aware but recent trends in the last few years has been for old video games to be reworked in a new “refreshing” feminist style. Old games that featured the “evil” concept of a masculine hero rescuing the damsel in distress are now routinely hacked or modded to reverse gender roles. Take for example the following articles from kotaku, a standard bearer for gaming culture. (more…)
IN an interesting post at The Orthosphere, Kristor explores the meaning of one of the familiar titles for Our Lord Jesus Christ. He writes: Jesus refers to himself often as the Son of Man (using the definite article). This title had always confused me. I thought that what distinguishes him from me and you – each of us likewise a child of men (note the indefinite article) – is that he is the son of God, and that this unique status formed the basis on which his ministry, his crucifixion, his Atonement for our sins, and so our redemption and salvation, all rested. Why would Jesus characterize himself as the Son of Man? I mean, sure, everyone in Palestine back then knew exactly what he meant in doing so. “Son of Man” was in the symbolic language of Israel another way of saying “Son of God.” But then, why should that have been so? See Kristor's illuminating comment at the end of the post about the masculinity of God.
A BLOGGER at Acts of the Apostasy has a very sensible proposal for small business that do not wish to support same-sex “marriage” but might be forced by discrimination suits to endorse it. He suggests that they donate a portion of their proceeds to organizations supporting traditional marriage. He writes:
AT Women for Men, Suzanne Venker responds to the Obama administration’s new Council on Women and Girls, which is charged with lowering the incident of sexual assault on college campuses. According to the Obama, one in five college women are “sexually assaulted.” The President, who never misses an opportunity to pander to the feminist vote, is expected to mention this epidemic of college rape in his State of the Union address. College sexual assault is a serious problem, but, as Venker argues, the figures are highly misleading.
The press release points out that eulogies are not a Catholic tradition, and indeed they seem to be borrowed from the sort of free-form procedure at some Protestant funerals, where a line of people take turns talking about the deceased. This sort of thing can easily get out of hand, but even where it doesn’t, it distracts from the sacramental aspect of a Catholic funeral, and turns it more into a sort of community sharing event.
The reaction in Ottawa has been very negative. Yesterday, our biggest paper, “The Citizen” published an op-ed piece on the subject which specifically refers to the “therapeutic” aspect of the eulogy, and makes no reference at all to God or eternity. The final paragraphs were the most telling, where the lady states that she hasn’t gone to mass for years (despite the innovation she approves of, which is eulogies at funerals).
THE white dove is one of the most beautiful birds in the animal kingdom. InChristian symbolism, it stands for the Holy Ghost, who appeared in both the form of the dove and as tongues of fire. From Matthew 3:16:
And Jesus being baptized, forthwith came out of the water: and lo, the heavens were opened to him: and he saw the Spirit of God descending as a dove, and coming upon him.
The Holy Ghost, which strengthens and enlightens mankind, is also known as the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete and the Spirit of Truth.
The dove is a modern secular symbol too. It stands for universal brotherhood and peace, and has been widely used by Communists and peaceniks. Everyone has seen the famous white dove on a bright blue background.
Given his belief in a universalistic Pan-Religion, it is safe to assume that for “Pope” Francis, this second meaning of the dove is important. And it is this second meaning that was intended when two doves were released by Francis and two children in St. Peter’s Square on Sunday in celebration of the annual “Caravan of Peace,” which strives for world peace. However, things did not go as intended. The doves were viciously attacked by a seagull and a crow. See the report at Novus Ordo Watch.
It seems strange that two birds from different species should join together to tackle the doves. We might read meaning into this. The seagull, white and less aggressive, is an apt symbol for the invisible forces that seek to deny the truths of the Church. These forces, as the Rev. Denis Fahey taught, lie in the heart of every man. The crow, much more belligerent, is an apt symbol for the visible, organized forces that seek to destroy the Church.
These two forces lie in constant wait. And no matter how many gestures of peace this non-Catholic “Pope” makes, they are eager and willing to destroy his phony Church of Peace and Love.
By the way, see this mind-blowing photo of Francis with the children. Now, tell me, dear reader, is this the true Pope?
