I DON’T pay much attention to the documents issued by the anti-Catholic Vatican in Rome these days. Lacking the sublime clarity of Church teachings, cleverly mixing truth with error, reassuring the simple with denunciations of abortion while simultaneously undermining the very moral and economic foundations of the family and unabashedly employing Marxist buzzwords and slogans, these statements are depressing, boring and far too long. They do not emanate from the Catholic Church.

I have, however, read the recent, highly-publicized Vatican declaration, Dignitatis Infinita, On Human Dignity — out of a sense of possibly misplaced duty. At 15,000 words with just eight mentions of Jesus (one more mention than the seven of “migrants”), this document, steeped as it is in ambiguity, is arguably dangerous to the free exercise of human dignity. But I won’t go there. Let’s just say, it was a slog. I did it and I would like to make a few comments here, for whatever they’re worth. Perhaps I have a point to make that no one else in the extensive news commentary has made.

Most important regarding this document, as is stated from the beginning, is that it was written to commemorate the 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, issued by the United Nations General Assembly on 10 December 1948. The mere fact that a body that claims to be the Catholic Church is promoting a secular, world parliament that explicitly denies the rights of God is so immensely significant, so overwhelmingly meaningful that most people can’t even see it.

From Dignitatis:

As we commemorate the 75th anniversary of that document, the Church sees an opportunity to proclaim anew its conviction that all human beings—created by God and redeemed by Christ—must be recognized and treated with respect and love due to their inalienable dignity. The anniversary also provides an occasion for the Church to clarify some frequent misconceptions concerning human dignity and to address some serious and urgent related issues. [bold added]

This is the single most important thing you need to know about this expensively-publicized declaration.

Paul 6 stood before the UN in 1965 in one of the most significant acts of his (false) pontificate and declared that the parliamentary body — not the Catholic Church — was “the greatest hope of the world.” And so it has been ever since. Dignitatis is part of a stream of revolutionary, Vatican II verbiage all dedicated to the same idea: the Religion of Humanity. “We too, more than anyone else, have the Cult of Man,” said Paul 6 at the closing session of Vatican II. Sadly, what claims today to be the Catholic Church has become the religious wing of secular world government founded on utopian, Marxist ideas and financial control of the weak — a super-government never dreamed of even by the most ambitious of emperors and pharaohs of the past. (more…)

ALAN writes:

Timewise, the 1962 motion picture The Music Man is only seven decades removed from the filth and junk that Americans today agree to accept in the name of entertainment. Morally, metaphysically, and esthetically, it is light-years removed.

It is from the summer of 1962 that I recall seeing advertisements on our black and white television for that new motion picture.  It seemed the ads were shown repeatedly.  One brief scene showed Robert Preston marching toward the camera in front of a large brass band.

But for whatever reason, at that time the promotional blurbs did not inspire my desire to see the movie. At age 12, I had yet to develop an appreciation for such entertainment; that would come several years later.

The movie was released that summer and played at the ornate Ambassador Theater at Seventh and Locust Streets in the heart of downtown St. Louis. (It was demolished in 1996. Architect Robert Powers wrote: “….the Ambassador was, in its day, perhaps the most spectacular of the St. Louis movie palaces, easily in league with the Fox. It was the last remaining movie palace in downtown…..” Source) (more…)

“THE idea is the weapon. And to be a weapon it must be an idea at variance with the natural trend of life. It must be a theory opposed to the facts of life. And no theory so opposed can be expected to take root and become the ruling factor, unless it appeals to the mind as reasonable, inspiring and good. The Truth frequently seems unreasonable; the Truth frequently is depressing; the Truth sometimes seems to be evil; but it has this eternal advantage, it is the Truth, and what is built thereon neither brings nor yields to confusion.”

— Henry Ford and the Editors of the Dearborn Independent

(more…)

"TEACH nothing new, but instill into all men's breasts things which the Fathers of revered memory have with harmony of statement taught . . . both in the rule of faith and in the observance of discipline, let the standard of antiquity be maintained throughout." --- St. Leo the Great  

"WHOEVER is humiliated on earth, is in Heaven and on the Cross; whoever has the first place on earth, has the last before God. He who knows the Cross, desires it; he who does not know it, runs away from it." --- St. Gemma Galgani  

 "PROFESSOR Dr. Margrit Kennedy describes how flaws in the money system cost us all about 40% extra for everything - interest costs. Interview by Dimitri Devyatkin."  

WHERE Eve was pride, she was humility. Where Eve was assertion, she was surrender. Where Eve was revolution, she was eternity. Where Eve was outward, she was inward. Where Eve was earthward, she was heavenward. Where Eve was death, she was birth. Where Eve was self, she was compassion. Where Eve was shame, she was modesty. Where Eve was materialism, she was love of poverty. Where Eve was fallen, she was mystical rose. Where Eve was suspicion, she was trust. Where Eve was folly, she was wisdom. Where Eve was liberation, she was restraint. Where Eve was impulse, she was contemplation. Where Eve was confusion, she was clarity. Where Eve was virtue-signaling, she was virtue. Where Eve was slave, she was queen.    

ALAN writes:

Fifty-seven years ago, I sat alone in a high school auditorium during the noon hour and tried to read — not reading required for classes, but books of my own choice. It was hard to do that because elsewhere in that auditorium at that hour were other students who took delight in being loud and boisterous. I was never one of them. I purposely chose a seat on the other side of the auditorium to get as far away from them as I could.

I was not a joiner or a “group person”.  By 1967 I had graduated from loud and boisterous and never regretted it. I found something much better: Silence and solitude in which to think, read, question, weigh and consider in realms of knowledge, history, philosophy, science, and current events.

I did not realize it then, but I had discovered (and preferred) the interior voice at a time when cultural forces like the “mass media” and mass entertainment were doing their best to overwhelm or extinguish the interior voice.

I was not the only such individual in that school, but we added up to a tiny percentage of the school population. In the 1930s-’40s, most of that loud and boisterous crowd would have been working at some productive job.  But in the 1960s they were reveling in a form of prolonged childhood made possible for them by their too-lenient and too-accommodating parents, those in the so-called “greatest generation”.

Most of those in that generation said little and did even less to oppose the conversion of high schools, colleges, and universities into playpens for prolonged adolescence.

Those in the “greatest generation” believed in the 1960s that the future for their children looked bright and promising. I heard them say so at the New York World’s Fair in 1965. (more…)

VIDEO link

(more…)

 PSALM 111 1. Blessed is the man that feareth the Lord: he shall delight exceedingly in his commandments. 2. His seed shall be mighty upon earth: the generation of the righteous shall be blessed. 3. Glory and wealth shall be in his house: and his justice remaineth for ever and ever. 4. To the righteous a light is risen up in darkness: he is merciful, and compassionate and just. 5. Acceptable is the man that sheweth mercy and lendeth: he shall order his words with judgment: 6. Because he shall not be moved for ever. 7. The just shall be in everlasting remembrance: he shall not fear the evil hearing. His heart is ready to hope in the Lord: 8. His heart is strengthened, he shall not be moved until he look over his enemies. 9. He hath distributed, he hath given to the poor: his justice remaineth for ever and ever: his horn shall be exalted in glory. 10. The wicked shall see, and shall be angry, he shall gnash with his teeth and pine away: the desire of the wicked shall perish.  

"THE suffering of adversity does not degrade you but exalts you. Human tribulation teaches you; it does not destroy you. The more we are afflicted in this world, the greater is our assurance for the next." --- St. Isidore of Seville  

(Source: Thuletide) "DIVERSITY is colossally detrimental to individuals and society alike, in almost very conceivable way: physical and mental health, social cohesion, violence, trust, criminality, etc. The more diverse a society is, the more pronounced and severe these negative effects are, however, even small amounts of racial or ethnic diversity are enough to cause a quantifiable negative impact. Individuals of every race fare worse within racially and ethnically heterogeneous societies, though racial heterogeneity has a greater negative impact than ethnic heterogeneity (when the ethnically heterogeneous society is mono-racial)." 'Diversity' means serfdom: "While the data presented in these studies is undeniably accurate and consistent, almost all of the “solutions” put forward by the authors are, to be frank, utterly ludicrous. There is only one valid solution that will sufficiently solve the problems of “diversity,” and that is no diversity at all. Segregation. A total annulment of “multiculturalism” and a return to the natural, tribalistic societies that are deeply ingrained in human behavior. This solution would be best for people of all races and ethnicities, as no race or ethnicity functions better within a racially heterogeneous society than they do in a racially homogeneous society. "Unfortunately, most people are either too politically compromised or too terrified of potential social and economic repercussions to publicly make this argument (they fear being branded a “Nazi,” threats to their employment and employability, or losing friends and relatives). Additionally, this solution is in direct opposition to the…

PRESIDENTIAL candidates never mention the most important problems we face. National elections are political theater and nothing more. Politicians are grifters, paid off to promote the interests of the Money Power.  

"NOW whilst they were speaking these things, Jesus stood in the midst of them, and saith to them: Peace be to you; it is I, fear not. But they being troubled and frightened, supposed that they saw a spirit. And he said to them: Why are you troubled, and why do thoughts arise in your hearts? See my hands and feet, that it is I myself; handle, and see: for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as you see me to have. And when he had said this, he shewed them his hands and feet. "But while they yet believed not, and wondered for joy, he said: Have you any thing to eat? And they offered him a piece of a broiled fish, and a honeycomb. And when he had eaten before them, taking the remains, he gave to them.  And he said to them: These are the words which I spoke to you, while I was yet with you, that all things must needs be fulfilled, which are written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me. Then he opened their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures." --- Luke, 24: 36-45  

FROM an essay by Peter Kreeft: We believe Christ's resurrection can be proved with at least as much certainty as any universally believed and well-documented event in ancient history. To prove this, we do not need to presuppose anything controversial (e.g. that miracles happen). But the skeptic must also not presuppose anything (e.g. that they do not). We do not need to presuppose that the New Testament is infallible, or divinely inspired or even true. We do not need to presuppose that there really was an empty tomb or post-resurrection appearances, as recorded. We need to presuppose only two things, both of which are hard data, empirical data, which no one denies:  The existence of the New Testament texts as we have them, and the existence (but not necessarily the truth) of the Christian religion as we find it today. The question is this: Which theory about what really happened in Jerusalem on that first Easter Sunday can account for the data? There are five possible theories: Christianity, hallucination, myth, conspiracy and swoon. 1. Jesus died. Jesus rose. [ Christianity ] 2. Jesus died. Jesus didn't rise—apostles deceived. [Hallucination] 3. Jesus died. Jesus didn't rise—apostles myth-makers [ Myth ] 4. Jesus died. Jesus didn't rise—apostles deceivers [ Conspiracy ] 5. Jesus didn't die. [ Swoon ] Read more.