AT minute 3:50 in this video of the revolting and schmaltzy memorial service for Charlie Kirk, whose alleged murder is filled with fakery, Erika Kirk flashes the devil’s horns to the audience. [Correction: That was “I love you” in sign language. It’s the kind of thing one would do at a rock concert, not in mourning,] You can see it for yourself. Erika, who also can’t hide a duper’s delight smile, can’t make it anymore clear.

Erika has an interesting history, including an alleged stint working in a Romanian foster home connected with the American military. The organization was accused by locals of trafficking in children.

See more here.

Quick recap of the shooting:

1.Shot isn’t from a 30.06, it would have been a giant boom as anyone who has ever used one, would know.
2. A 30.06 would have blew the back off his neck out the size of an orange and spattered it all over.
3. Security behind him making baseball signs right before shooting.
4.Camera man immediately drops his camera a walks away.
5.Guy on the left doesn’t even look, just backs up and leaves.
6.The guy directly behind him was at drumpf’s fake assassination
7.Shirt blows up not sucked into wound and no blood
8.His eyes and mouth are tightly closed as if he anticipated
9.The ‘f’ in freedom on his shirt disappears
10.The ring moves from his ring finger to his pinky finger in a split second.
11.Kirk is loaded into an SUV on a gurney…..where did the gurney come from? where is the ambulance?
12.Plane owned by huge … funder turns off transponder, as it likely took kirk away.
13.His … beyond-put-together wife, is ready for world wide spot light hours after death asking for money……..crocodile tears, tons of smiles and laughs……..no puffy eyes. Her scene by the casket with someone leaning over her head with a camera is beyond retarded…..NO ONE would do that…….and did you notice the big gold, diamond encrusted, G ring? Freemasons baby……..Most women who really loved their husbands, would never be able to sign up for a CEO postion less than a week after their husbands death…….fake wife, fake charlie……fake (bleep) world……all your watchin’ is a puppet show, yea, the whole worlds a stage……..

Also, the crime scene was not secured and was just cleaned up by TPUSA staffers, with no blood in sight.

[edited slightly]

— Comments —

Kathy G. writes:

I never paid much attention to Charlie Kirk. I knew he had very big Jewish donors, so was certainly one of their “JUDEO-Christians”, if not an actual crypto. The more I learn about him, the more I’m leaning toward the latter.

I was shocked to see this meme, though:

Here is a supposed Christian shepherd, pretty much outright denying Christ, if this is true. I’ve been trying to find the actual video of his remarks at this “Opening Ceremony of the Pilgrimage Road”, and have been unsuccessful. He’s also supposedly toured Gaza and said everything is fine there.

I did come upon a Formal Gaslight (aka “speech”) by Netanyahu (Miliekowski) where he brags about the Jews having their home back, and that no one should be driven from their home. I was amazed at the gall of the man, and then I remembered that, to them, only Jews are human and deserving of homes. The rest of us deserve pens and culling.

Between reports of the largest contingent of the US Congress ever traveling to Israel and pledging allegiance to Israel, and assembling under a sign saying “50 states One Israel”, perhaps a formal announcement of de facto US surrender of sovereignty to Israel by “Our Representatives” is not far off.

Perhaps the Charlie Kirk “shooting” was the distraction for all those antics going on over there.

Janice G. writes:

I was just forwarded a recent fund raising letter from TPUSA, written by Erika Kirk.

In spite of a little bit of cheesy phrasing here and there in her letter, she wrote well and very movingly about her and Charlie’s love story; there were tones of sincerity that really had me.
Then – she writes near the end:

“He wore a red bracelet on his wrist that read “Work harder. Be better.”
He never took it off. Until one day a student came up to him after a speech and asked about it. Charlie slipped it off and gave it to them (sic).

…that was who he was.”

I read on to see if she might reveal anything more about the red bracelet’s history. Nothing. My skepticism came right back!
I am pretty certain that she knows the real reason, but Erika’s breezy explanation of why Charlie openly wore the bracelet will easily be accepted. How many have asked questions about that kind of stuff, anyway? Her word is gospel.

She is Joan of Arc, and Charlie has passed into legend. A fairy tale you couldn’t make up! They had it all. Money, looks, youth, a worshipful following, high political standing, a rock steady marriage based on chivalric romance, family and small-F faith. He is the ideal patron saint of the American way. She is a living apostle. We want to have that lifestyle and the cult’s blessing can give it to us!

When you need a lifejacket of fantasy to keep you afloat because the ship of reality is sinking, facts and truth feel like an anchor weighing you down!

Who can be sure what is ahead, since this is causing big divisions within like minded groups? If you don’t grieve, you are bad or crazy! If you do grieve, you are bad or crazy! Aloneness is going to abound more. I keep my thoughts to myself and my mouth shut because of the divide. The funny part is that I have no surety of any official narrative. Kirk may be anywhere, alive or shot dead. It’s my honest opinion. But even that isn’t good enough. If you’re not all in on one or the other side, you’re out! This is being compared to early Christianity. Well, if it is, it is minus Christ! Where is the good in that?!  It is blasphemy, heresy and sacrilege all rolled into one.

I do take hope in the knowledge there are others who have not given in to mind-control, anger, and hysteria.

Laura writes:

Who writes a fundraising letter a week after a spouse’s death?!

For those who don’t know, a red bracelet is worn by those who practice the teachings of the Kabbalah. Good explanations of the merging of good and evil in the Kabbalah can be found here.

Zeno writes:

Wow. They don’t hide it anymore, do they? I knew very little about the Kirks before this, but the more I read, the less I trust them. Erika’s actual surname is Frantzve (sounds Jewish, although it could arguably be German. It’s not a common surname, at least with that spelling). She looks like a fake blonde and possibly had plastic surgery. She seems to wear a lot of expensive jewelry for someone who is supposedly a modest Christian. Both of her parents appear to have worked directly or indirectly for the US government (Defense and/or Homeland Security).

There is a video where she says that she met Charlie for the first time in Israel. So many things don’t add up or are different from their official story. About her strange gesture, what is the official explanation? Curiously, no one seems to have noticed it. Most comments on the video just say how she’s “strong”, how she’s a “woman of faith”. etc. Are people blind?

Laura writes:

A former Green Beret analyzes the ballistics claims for the Kirk shooting and says the idea that his neck would have absorbed the bullet from this kind of high-powered rifle is nonsense.

[Note: I know nothing else about this channel. Not an endorsement.]

The media is calling it a miracle.

Terry Morris writes:

Laura, you wrote:

“A former Green Beret analyzes the ballistics claims for the Kirk shooting and says the idea that his neck would have absorbed the bullet from this kind of high-powered rifle is nonsense.”

I’ve seen several of those guys say the same. They’re all full of sh*t, pardon my French. Click bait.

As I iterated in a previous thread, I know lots and lots of hunters who are all very familiar with high powered rifles and what they do to living tissue at 150-200 yds. Not that I need their confirmation, but I do find it interesting that not a single one of them I’ve spoken to since Charlie’s murder has ever uttered a syllable in disbelief that what they saw was real, for reasons already stated. They’ve also watched those videos, and they know as well as I do that those persons making them are full of sh*t. There are also videos by persons claiming similar creds who agree with me. Who to believe? Well, I just go with my own experiences and what they’ve taught me, and pay no mind to click batters talking out their hind parts. But that’s just me.

I agree that the memorial service was a sh*t show, and especially that Erika Kirk is a bad actor. And by “actor,” I don’t mean thespian; I mean she is, in my estimation, lying to everyone and acting in bad faith. As though all of her fake tears and photo ops were not cringy enough in and of themselves, she uses Charlie’s murder to lecture husbands and would-be husbands about how not to treat their wives. Even if I were to grant that there might be a time and a place for that, the memorial service was definitely not it. I believe she despised Charlie, and is secretly glad that he is gone, her rise to CEO @ Turning Point notwithstanding. But, again, I’ve been happily married for 40 years, all of which time I’ve heard similar lectures, usually by persons whose marriages ultimately prove to be failures, or at least highly dysfunctional. …

Laura writes:

I’ve seen several of those guys say the same. They’re all full of sh*t, pardon my French. Click bait.

Instead of engaging in ad hominem attacks, perhaps you could address his actual points. I think anyone who is doing this for click bait is definitely misjudging his audience.

Not that I need their confirmation, but I do find it interesting that not a single one of them I’ve spoken to since Charlie’s murder has ever uttered a syllable in disbelief that what they saw was real, for reasons already stated.

Most people are not willing to question publicly a mainstream news story involving death and risk being called a “conspiracy theorist.” Many gun owners have not called out the transparently false mass shootings, with incredibly improbable marksmanship by amateurs.  (Fakenukes Phil rails against these cowards here.) Your hunter friends may have no problem with the story, but obviously there are enough gun users who do have a problem with it for some of them to go to the trouble of actually analyzing the shooting publicly.

Anyway, if you know anyone who has produced video evidence, like these others have, that a Mauser rifle from that distance could leave no exit wound after passing through soft tissue, I’d be interested. The coroner said the bullet was right under the skin. This guy in the video and others say that’s impossible.

Laura writes:

According to a Turning Point spokesman, Andrew Kolvet, a doctor who allegedly treated Kirk said normally that type of rifle leaves an exit wound. He said it was a miracle.

So your hunter friends may think it’s normal, but a surgeon does not.

 [J]ust spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital…

He said the bullet “absolutely should have gone through, which is very very normal for a high powered, high velocity round.

I’ve seen wounds from this caliber many times and they always just go through everything.

This would have taken a moose or two down, an elk, etc.”

But it didn’t go through. Charlie’s body stopped it. I mentioned to his doctor that there were dozens of staff, students, and special guests standing directly behind Charlie on the other side of the tent, and he replied:

“It was an absolute miracle that someone else didn’t get killed.”

“His bone was so healthy and the density was so so impressive that he’s like the man of steel. It should have just gone through and through. It likely would have killed those standing behind him too.”

In the end, the coroner did find the bullet just beneath the skin. Even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him.”

Gimme a break. They are laughing at you.

They don’t even bother to make these stories plausible because they know people will gobble them up as long as they hit emotional buttons.

This is the type of bullet that was right below the skin:

Not surprisingly, Kolvet, who called Kirk a “man of steel,” is Jewish. Jews, as St. Paul noted, excel at making up fables. That’s why they’re so good at producing movies. This is a movie production from start to finish.

By the way, in defense of Erika on one point, she was apparently flashing “I love you” in sign language, not the devil’s horns. I apologize for that.

Laura writes:

Peggy Hall has some analysis of the “miracle bullet,” with quotes from other skeptics:

She writes:

Well, there you have it friends. Just like Jesus Christ, Charlie Kirk performed miracles with his death.

Will there be a Charlie Kirk resurrection next?

Think I’m being disrespectful?

The liars and cheaters and con-men perpetrating this outrageous narrative are the ones disrespecting you and your intelligence and common sense.

You’ll see more when I expose the outlandish statements at the memorial, where we were told we were in “Charlie’s Church” and “Charlie declared from Heaven…” and “Charlie died for you…” and “Charlie sacrificed his life for yours.”

Yes. it’s getting more and more outlandish, ridiculous and absurd as time goes by.

And here’s good commentary from Sandra on Gab about the memorial service:

Crisis actor Erika Kirk, the pageant queen, slithers into the spotlight for the revolting finale of this theatrical production. She’s announced to the stage like she won “American Idol,” complete with pyrotechnics to celebrate her arrival as the new CEO of Turning Point USA. As the melodramatic music swells to a crescendo, this sociopath tilts her head skyward with icy poise, capturing a cinematic moment of plastic despair. Every traitorous shill in the lineup has already endorsed this cheap farce, and now Erika, cloaked in sanctimonious religiosity, shepherds the gullible herd into the next phase of the JWO’s psychological programming. It’s all fanfare, glitz, pomp, and grift – a tour de force in mind control layered within fantastical salvation narratives.

Sept. 25, 20025

Zeno writes:

I know little about guns or bullets, but I worked with video post-production, and the video (at least the most famous one) shows signs of having been manipulated. But to be honest I haven’t watched all the videos available (nor want to). Also, why the neck (or the ear?) Perhaps simply because that’s easier to fake than a successful shot to the head?

Anyway — I’m thinking now that part of the purpose of this operation was to keep us discussing this event forever, so, for me, that’s enough, I’m ready to move on.

And if there was any doubt that the shooting was “fake”, I think this whole circus with Trump and the supposed “widow” and Carlson etc made it pretty clear that it is all just a show. Just television entertainment for the masses. Nothing is serious with these people. It’s all a mockery, a clown show. They just can’t stop laughing, even in “funerals”.

Thanks for your good work, though.

Laura writes:

Thanks. I completely sympathize with your fatigue. The nature of these psyops is overkill. (But don’t forget that they did this to us.)