“NAZI, Nazi, Nazi!”
You hear leftists say this all the time of conservatives who oppose Cultural Marxism and who believe in hierarchy and natural differences.
But Hitler was a revolutionary, not a conservative. The smear is merely projection.
In “Hitler and Nazism was [sic] Leftist,” Lindsay Wheeler writes:
Hitler was a pure leftist. Nationalism has NO bearing on what it means to be Left or Right. French Jacobins were very nationalistic. Hitler said himself that he was the full counterpart of the French Revolution. That makes him a leftist. Both the work of Von Kuehnelt-Leddihn and Eric Voegelin compliment each other in their description of fascism, national socialism, as leftist. The term “leftism” is only another term for Gnosticism. What is gnostic, is leftist; the terms are synonymous.
The only rightist influence upon the National Socialists was the Spartans but this incidence was secondary and an after-effect. The Spartan Way provided the idea of masculinity and a warrior code of honor; this the Nazis did borrow. The Spartans were horrified of democracy and egalitarianism as seen in the case of Kinadon. The Spartans did not provide the intellectual or motive behind what they did, their influence solely rested in the culture the Nazis attempted to create past their revolutionary take-over of the German state.
The revolutionary fervor, the revolutionary fire of the National Socialists came from the French Revolution which passed through the lens of Marx and Hegel which was initiated by the teachings of the kabbala.
Hitler and the Nazis are pure leftists. The historical record is clear, in what they said, and what they [sang.] Hitler stood up at the Beer Hall Putsch, jumped up on a chair, fired a pistol into the air, and said, “Let the Revolution begin”. Revolution is Leftist. No rightist would say that.
The problem is that much of academia is Marxist and/or Liberal. They have an agenda—and they are not beholden to facts nor history. “Hitler is of the Right” is pure Marxist propaganda that has NO basis in fact or history.
I recommend reading Mr. Wheeler’s article in full. He makes excellent points. Unfortunately, in order to do so, you have to sign up to academia.edu.
This is not an endorsement of all Mr. Wheeler’s articles.
— Comments —
Kathy G. writes:
It’s an alarming trend to see “National Socialism” as some kind of panacea, a politically desirable goal, that’s troubling.
Socialism is simply communism-lite. Granted, it may be less evil in a homogeneous country, with leaders that truly care about the citizens, but, eventually, that will change the closer communism comes.
I’ve got a lot of questions and concerns about Hitler, and am also alarmed by his rehabilitation and admiration by many “on the right”. He made some disastrous military decisions, there are issues of occultism, and his rise from obscurity seem to me to be red flags.
His supposed bunker suicide with no remains seems terribly cowardly/convenient, given what the surviving German people had to endure after the war.
I’m inclined to think that the German people were handed a hero, Albert Pike style, that delivered them up to annihilation.
