PEOPLE unfamiliar with journalism at all — or who are themselves deceivers — might think figures like Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens are real journalists.
They are not. They are both talented actors and agents, hired to push agendas and read scripts.
Tucker, who loves to wear his Kabbalah bracelet and sometimes just can’t keep up the act — such as the moment he broke out in duping-delight hilarity when he compared Charlie Kirk to Jesus Christ — has openly admitted to being a liar and you can see his public admission, as well as a very good example of his lying, in the first few minutes of the above clip, thanks to ‘Call for an Uprising.’
There is no more reason to trust his friend Candy, the supposed conservative “Catholic” millionaire who burst on the scene during the Covid psyop without any prior significant platform — always a sign that someone is being deliberately promoted. Candice likes to throw up Masonic hand-signs, delivers her lines with theatrical facial expressions intended to convey sincerity and has failed to answer the most basic questions about her best bud Charlie’s alleged assassination before drumming up the ridiculous theory, based on a few texts provided by the very same, completely untrustworthy people who have participated in a coverup regarding the obvious anomalies in the event, that her friend was assassinated by Israel, for which there is zero physical evidence in the face of abundant physical evidence that “Charlie” was not the victim of violence, leading reasonable people to suspect that Charlie is, as FBI director Kash Patel (you know, the man who fired FBI managers in the Salt Lake City area in August, one month before the event) publicly stated, in “Valhalla,” the actual name for the U.S. marshal’s witness protection program.
Let’s leave aside the preposterousness of Israel laying a finger on such a loyal foot soldier. Charlie, the character, was a fanatical Zionist who observed the Sabbath on Saturdays, publicly joked about the deaths of civilians in Gaza, chose an actress “wife” connected with intelligence agencies and Freemasonry; promoted Noahide-style executions of political enemies, and bullied people on American campuses when they wondered aloud whether Christians should worship the state of Israel. Charlie was so trustworthy that his operation was given tens of millions of dollars over the years by other loyal foot soldiers. He “died” a very rich man. The public worship of Charlie, the “martyr for freedom,” has included many Zionist organizations.
The state of journalism is indeed very bad, especially when supposedly Catholic commentators promote and canonize brazen liars. These MAGA Catholics (some with evident Russian backing) have hitched their wagons to a false, idolatrous political movement and personality cult, the purpose of which is to raze to the ground the last remnants of conservative resistance to one world government, the dystopian tyranny that is already here but has not reached its full realization in mass digital control. These MAGA Catholic cultists want you to be not truly patriotic but to embrace the Americanism condemned by Pope Pius IX and Pope Leo XIII. Beneath the youthful face of Charlie lies psychological warfare and a darkness that defies the mental sloth and gullibility of people accustomed to virtual reality and propaganda.
Charlie Kirk, who was pictured numerous times flashing Masonic hand signs, publicly stated in an interview that he likes to keep an “open mind” when it comes to secrecy-bound Freemasonry. No surprise, for he himself was not always an honest person. To cite one example, he frequently said that TPUSA was a grassroots organization that he formed himself on a shoestring budget.
This is not true.
The multimillionaire businessman Bill Montgomery publicly stated that he handpicked Charlie when he was 17 and then traveled around the country with him for two years to prepare him for his role. Two years! How bizarre! A teenager traveling with a man so much older! But then both were what the Freemasons like to call “traveling men.”
Before anyone indulges theories about who killed the man known as Charlie Kirk, convincing evidence that he was killed is needed.
Where is the autopsy? Where’s the death certificate? Where is the ballistics report? Where is the blood-soaked T-shirt Charlie wore that day? Why haven’t Erika or Charlie’s parents expressed concern that he was not given appropriate medical care? Where are the criminal charges and civil lawsuits by family against those who denied Charlie emergency medical care at the scene? Where are the criminal charges against those who tampered with the evidence in the hours immediately after the “assassination” by cleaning up the crime scene? Where are the criminal or civil charges against the University of Utah for further tampering with evidence by wrecking and rebuilding the crime scene in the immediate aftermath? Where are photos of Charlie’s body? Where is the DNA evidence and proof that Kirk’s body was actually buried? Where are his parents? Given that probably millions of people have asked these questions, why hasn’t TPUSA, Erika and the Trump administration responded to them? We could go on and on, even without touching upon his wife’s ridiculous behavior. The case is closed until real evidence appears. The first rule in all criminal investigations is to determine what crime actually occurred. No one should pay the slightest attention in the meantime to theories of who killed Kirk.
[Disclaimer: This is not a blanket endorsement of ‘Call for an Uprising.’ Seems to be an excellent and generally trustworthy analyst, except on the Jesuit issue.]
