BOB PREVOST, the aging Marxist hippie scandalously and blasphemously impersonating a pope of Holy Roman Catholic Church, urged his thoroughly cheated followers earlier this week — all those millions so easily impressed by celebrity status and the mere outward appearance of religious authority — to embrace the heathen religion of nature worship.
“Green communism” is not a new program at the usurped Vatican, but Prevost is dutifully taking it to the next level.
All “Leo XIV” said in his homily delivered during the “Holy Mass for the Care of Creation” in the lovely pontifical gardens which have been outright stolen from Catholics was as boring and uninspiring as any of the thousands of bureaucratic reports on sustainability funded by the United Nations.
He stated,
On this World Day of Prayer for the Care of Creation, the readings chosen for today’s liturgy offer us two invitations to contemplate the works of the Lord — a task that is certainly not difficult in the setting of these beautiful gardens.
The Book of Wisdom encourages us to contemplate the beauty and power of creation, in order to appreciate its Creator (cf. Wis 13:1–9). It would be superficial to marvel at fire, wind, rushing waters or the stars of heaven, without allowing our gaze to rise to the Creator of such wonders.
Psalm 18 urges us to lift our eyes to contemplate the heavens, which proclaim the glory of God, and the firmament, which declares the work of his hands. All creation speaks to us of the greatness of its Creator, if only our eyes and hearts remain open to such a great mystery.
There is nothing in these opening lines inherently objectionable though a simple reading of the relevant psalms would have done more to make the point with divine eloquence. The Bible overflows with praise for the magnificence of God’s creation and we need nothing more than Holy Scripture to recall us to an appreciation of nature as God’s gift and an understanding of the misuse fallen human beings have made of it. (The concept of a “World Day of Prayer” is highly problematic. The Catholic Church can offer prayer, the world altogether cannot.)
As he continues, Prevost mocks the sacred theology behind the biblical precepts by not once mentioning the Trinity, or Jesus Christ — who reigns over Creation — or the natural order instituted for the use of human beings. His reference to the Creator would please any Freemason with his “Grand Architect.” (Leo never mentions the Catholic Church at all, in fact, which is not surprising since he doesn’t belong to it.) His recommendation to “care for creation” employs scandalous language that can only confuse the already confused.
One can — and should — care for the honor of God. One should care for the good of one’s soul. One should care for the eternal and temporal welfare of others, but one should never care for the earth because it is not a person or a god. One should tend, protect, cultivate and subjugate nature, but never care for it.
The use of this single word connotes pantheism, which Pope Pius IX in his Syllabus of Errors, a document which all Catholics are bound to obey, infallibly condemned:
ERROR 1. There exists no Supreme, all-wise, all-provident Divine Being, distinct from the universe, and God is identical with the nature of things, and is, therefore, subject to changes. In effect, God is produced in man and in the world, and all things are God and have the very substance of God, and God is one and the same thing with the world, and, therefore, spirit with matter, necessity with liberty, good with evil, justice with injustice. — Allocution “Maxima quidem,” June 9, 1862.
Prevost’s homily is an exhortation to ecumenism and nature worship, which is exactly what the powers of this world want to advance the goal of world government. The more worship of the earth and “green communism,” the more popular consent to the abolition of borders and national sovereignty for the sake of rules to save the earth and “care for creation.” The more worship of the deity of inanimate nature, the farther human beings drift from natural law and the notion of a Creator who commands right and wrong — the moral compass by which they can even condemn totalitarianism.
An absolutist state never approves of the one true religion because it enables its adherents to discern its inherent injustice.
That human beings, especially those in historically non-Christian nations, have trashed nature no one can reasonably deny. The solutions are practical and mostly local. These crimes mostly involve human selfishness and greed — and the solutions to those evils are the spiritual regeneration of man that can only be had through true love of God, not through “care of creation” — a loaded bureaucratic phrase to disguise atheistic, secular tyranny.
All the Machiavellian phrases of modern tyranny and secular humanism mean the very opposite of what they literally say. You must always flip them around. Do you think the new ‘data centers’, with their humming, drumming, belching, toxically bestial emanations, represent “care for creation?” Do you think jets spraying aerosols in the sunny sky represent “care for creation?”
On the theological level though, this is not “care for creation,” but its very destructive demotion from the gift of an all-wise, omnipotent God to the emanation of an impersonal force incapable of elevating or saving a single human soul.
All of the earth, every single one of its wonders, is not worth as much as a single immortal soul and the moment there is not one soul on earth devoted to truly Catholic worship of the one true God, worship that is now only to be had in the disparaged and despised highways and byways of exile from our churches, is the moment the entire created order comes to a crashing end.
The entire purpose of creation is to glorify the triune God, and no other.
