FROM Giorgio Agamben's article "Biosecurity and Politics," in a translation provided by D. Alan Dean: "WHAT is striking about the reactions to the apparatuses of exception that have been put in place in our country (and not only in this one) is the inability to observe them beyond the immediate context in which they seem to operate. Rare are those who attempt to interpret them as symptoms and signs of a broader experiment — as any serious political analysis would require — in which what is at stake is a new paradigm for the governance of men and things. Already in a book published seven years ago, now worth rereading carefully (Tempêtes microbiennes, Gallimard 2013), Patrick Zylberman described the process by which health security, hitherto on the margins of political calculations, was becoming an essential part of state and international political strategies. At issue is nothing less than the creation of a sort of “health terror” as an instrument for governing what are called “worst case scenarios.” It is according to this logic of the worst that already in 2005 the World Health Organization announced “2 to 150 million deaths from bird flu approaching,” suggesting a political strategy that states were not yet ready to accept at the time. Zylberman shows that the apparatus being suggested was articulated in three points: 1) the construction, on the basis of a possible risk, of a fictitious scenario in which data are presented…

FROM Robert F. Kennedy of the Children's Defense Fund: I would like to draw your attention urgently to important issues related to the next Covid-19 vaccination. For the first time in the history of vaccination, the so-called last generation mRNA vaccines intervene directly in the genetic material of the patient and therefore alter the individual genetic material, which represents the genetic manipulation, something that was already forbidden and until then considered criminal. This intervention can be compared to genetically manipulated food, which is also highly controversial. Even if the media and politicians currently trivialize the problem and even stupidly call for a new type of vaccine to return to normality, this vaccination is problematic in terms of health, morality and ethics, and also in terms of genetic damage that, unlike the damage caused by previous vaccines, will be irreversible and irreparable. Dear patients, after an unprecedented mRNA vaccine, you will no longer be able to treat the vaccine symptoms in a complementary way. They will have to live with the consequences, because they can no longer be cured simply by removing toxins from the human body, just as a person with a genetic defect like Down syndrome, Klinefelter syndrome, Turner syndrome, genetic cardiac arrest, hemophilia, cystic fibrosis, Rett syndrome, etc.), because the genetic defect is forever! This means clearly: if a vaccination symptom develops after an mRNA vaccination, neither I nor any other therapist can help you, because the damage caused…

FROM the important new book The Contagion Myth: Why Viruses (Including “Coronavirus”) Are Not the Cause of Disease by Thomas Cowan, M.D. and Sally Fallon Morrell:

On September 26, 2019, 5G wireless was turned on in Wuhan, China (and officially launched November 1) with a grid of about ten thousand 5G base stations — more than exist in the entire United States — all concentrated in one city. A spike in cases occurred on February 13 — the same week that Wuhan turned on its 5G network for monitoring traffic.

Illness has followed 5G installation in all the major cities in America, starting with New York in Fall 2019 in Manhattan, along with parts of Brooklyn, the Bronx and Queens — all subsequent coronavirus hot spots. Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Dallas, Cleveland, and Atlanta soon followed, with some five thousand towns and cities now covered. Citizens of the small country of San Marino (the first country in the world to install 5G, in September 2018) have had the longest exposure to 5G and the highest infection rate — four times higher than Italy (which deployed 5G in June 2019), and twenty-seven times higher than Croatia, which has not deployed 5G. In rural areas, the illness blamed on the coronavirus is slight to nonexistent.

In Europe, illness is highly correlated with 5G rollout. For example, Milan and other areas in Northern Italy have the densest 5G coverage, and northern Italy has twenty-two times as many coronavirus cases as Rome. (more…)

DR. Roger Hodkinson, former Chairman of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons Committee in Ottawa, called into a public meeting in Edmonton, Alberta and gave his views on the COVID measures.

How long do you think it will take for this powerful statement to be banned by Youtube, which has censored hundreds of educational videos about COVID? How long do you think it will take? I say, one day, tops. (more…)

HELENA writes:

Yesterday, I was at a super-expensive “luxury” store, one of those places with that morbid, death-glorifying “fashion” that is everywhere. I was walking through from the mall to get outside. I prefer to walk this way rather than through the main entrance, to avoid the crowd, and there are a few nice things to see in the store, like the small handbags and other accessories.

I asked an attendant about a winter parka, several thousand dollars for this down-filled luxury, when her manager swooped over and said: “We have to ask you to wear a mask. If you don’t have one, we can give you one.” (more…)

HERE IS YET ANOTHER good piece, this time by Giuseppe Vafanculo at Winter Watch, on the increasing "cases" of You-Know-What. This is not new to readers of this site, but it bears repeating over and over again: The lynchpin to the scamdemic is the wildly inaccurate and literally useless test being used by the corrupt Center for Disease Control (CDC) and World Health Organization (WHO) scientific “experts” to claim the shocking numbers of infected humans: the PCR test. Created in 1985 to enhance AIDS research, the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test won a Nobel Prize for its inventor Kary Mullis. He invented the PCR test as a tool for biomedical research and criminal forensics. PCR can be extremely deceptive in the diagnosis of infectious diseases, though. The inventor himself argued against using PCR as a diagnostic tool for infections. “I’m skeptical that a PCR test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine,” warns Dr. David Rasnick, biochemist and protease developer. A true rebel against Big Pharma and the CDC, Mullis insisted that it states on the box of every PCR test: “This is not a diagnostic tool.” PUT THAT IN YOUR PIPE AND SMOKE IT, DR. RICHARD LEVINE.  

I HEARD an interesting talk this summer given by a nurse who practices “natural medicine.” She was a mother of nine children who lived with her family on a farm in Virginia.

Years ago when she and her husband were living in Africa as Protestant missionaries, she had an awakening about the practice of mainstream, modern medicine.

One day, their little daughter climbed to the top of a pile of sewage that always stood in the village, sat down and put her thumb in her mouth.

The girl became deathly ill. She was evacuated by plane to a big, modern hospital where she was given the best possible treatment by the best possible specialists. The girl survived, but she was very weak when she returned from the hospital weeks later. The mother spoke to doctors in America and France, trying to find possible solutions. Nothing worked and her daughter grew weaker again.

Filled with worry and believing her daughter may slowly die, the mother went to talk to an old woman in the village. “This kind of thing must have happened to others many times,” she said. “What do you do for them?” (more…)