“You cannot know Jesus without having problems. And I dare say, ‘But if you want to have a problem, go to the street to know Jesus – you’ll end up having not one, but many!’ But that is the way to get to know Jesus! You cannot know Jesus in first class! One gets to know Jesus in going out [into] every day [life]. You cannot get to know Jesus in peace and quiet, nor even in the library: Know Jesus.”
IN the entry “Jorge Bergoglio and the Vacant Throne,” Sage McLaughlin writes:
Whether or not Bergolio is formally guilty of heresy, it appears that he is in a state of objective apostasy. Practically every word he utters is crafted so as to add confusion and muddy the waters of Church teaching, always behind the cloak of words such as “nuance.” Those who strain and squint in an effort to find the rock-ribbed orthodoxy ingeniously hidden beneath all the layers of liberal Jesuit-speak are simply deluding themselves, because they cannot admit the terrible truth. (I marvel daily at the scale and scope of the effort by conservatives throughout the Western world to deny the seriousness of our situation, but particularly in matters of faith and morals, and particularly among Catholics who cannot face the awful realities confronting us.)
To lighten the apparent stress on you and your readers created by the Pope’s recent interview, may I offer a bit of welcome relief in the form of a recent declaration by the CEO of the Italian pasta maker, Barilla, with the eponymous name of Guido Barilla?
Recently, the CEO of Barilla Pasta, the Emilia-Romagna (Central Italy) company that is the largest pasta producing company in the world, with manufacturing outlets in, amongst other countries, the U.S., declared on a radio program that his company would not use homosexual families or couples in their ads. That announcement, which sent the European homosexual lobby in paroxysms of rage, was: “I would never do an advert with a homosexual family…if the gays don’t like it they can go an eat another brand.” (more…)
MUCH has been made of Pope Francis’s references to abortion and homosexuality in his “Big Heart” interview that appeared in America magazine and little about the disturbingly open-ended comment he made regarding divorce and remarriage. As with so much of the interview, it is the suggestion of approval that is alarming. (more…)
Comments Off on What Did the Pope Say About Divorce?
For the umpteenth time, conservatives, repeat after me: Never Trust A Bush!
It has only become more clear over the years that the Bush Clan is and has always been a cabal of social and political liberals masquerading as conservative to preserve its political base in the Republican Party – both because the Clan’s original power base was the Connecticut GOP and because, despite strenuous efforts to re-package themselves as Hispanic, the Bushes are just too WASPy and ‘whitebread’ to be national contenders in today’s diversity-obsessed and anti-white Democratic Party.
Now the Bush Clan paterfamilias has made it even more obvious, for those who still don’t get it, that Bushite liberalism does not begin with the generation of W and Jeb. (more…)
Comments Off on George H. W. Bush Attends Lesbian “Wedding”
ONE OF the common arguments against school uniforms is that they do not allow children to express their individuality. I remember a mother at a school my older son attended stating that she strongly believed her six- and eight-year-old daughters would be stifled in their creativity and self-awareness if they were ever to wear uniforms. As Marian T. Horvat points out in this article today at Tradition in Action, this is a quite laughable argument given the extreme uniformity and herd-like fashion schoolchildren exhibit in their choice of clothes. Fashion is fascist in its dictates to the young. A girl’s entire identity hinges on adequately displaying not her creativity but her conformity. Dr. Horvat writes:
[I] was quite irritated when I picked up the Los Angeles Times one morning recently and found a law professor taking a strong stand against school uniforms in an editorial titled “Dressing down school dress codes.” (September 5, 2013). Her dressing down of uniforms centers basically on the same old worn-out arguments that uniforms stifle individuality and are anti-democratic. (more…)
Comments Off on The Uniformity of Schools without Uniforms
IN THE previous entry on Pope Francis, a reader recommended this article by George Nuemayr at The American Spectator. Nuemayr is not among those Catholic commentators dismissing the seriousness of the un-orthodox views recently expressed by the Pope. However, he believes there is hope in the possibility that he will undergo correction. He writes:
Even if given the most charitable reading, Pope Francis’s recent interview with Jesuit publications was alarming in its spirit-of-Vatican II liberalism. Catholicism is not a personality cult and so Catholics, following the example of St. Paul, don’t need to ooh and aah over unsound, non-infallible remarks, which were made incidentally to publications like America known principally for their heterodoxy. (more…)
Sheep on the Coast, Eugène Joseph Verboeckhoven; 1878
STEVEN T. writes:
I discovered this website today, and I just had to inform you of it. “The Dahesh Museum of Art is the only institution in the United States devoted to collecting, exhibiting, and interpreting works by Europe’s academically trained artists of the 19th and early 20th centuries. The Dahesh serves a diverse audience by placing these artists in the broader context of 19th-century visual culture, and by offering a fresh appraisal of the role academies played in reinvigorating the classical ideals of beauty, humanism, and skill.”
I believe that you would enjoy this immensely, as will I.
IT is an enduring and unshakeable doctrine of the Catholic Church that anyone who rejects part of the faith, even one article of the faith, rejects the whole. Can a non-Catholic, someone who rejects the faith, legitimately be a pope? The answer seems obvious. Nevertheless, it is urgently, now more than ever, in need of articulation.
In 1559, Pope Paul IV proclaimed that a non-Catholic cannot be the Roman Pontiff. His words are a definitive statement on the issue in general. Paul IV wrote the following in his Apostolic Constitution “Cum ex Apostolatus Officio:
[I]f ever at any time it shall appear that any Bishop, even if he be acting as an Archbishop, Patriarch or Primate; or any Cardinal of the aforesaid Roman Church, or, as has already been mentioned, any legate, or even the Roman Pontiff, prior to his promotion or his elevation as Cardinal or Roman Pontiff, has deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy:
(i) the promotion or elevation, even if it shall have been uncontested and by the unanimous assent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, void and worthless; (more…)
Comments Off on Jorge Bergoglio and the Vacant Throne
Here is a telling vignette of a new cold war between an America hell-bent upon tearing herself up by the roots and a Russia striving, however unevenly, to reconnect to her roots. Last month, The Thinking Housewife posted a comment about homosexualists’ threats to disrupt the opening night of the Metropolitan Opera of New York’s 2013-2014 season, a gala performance of Tchaikovsky’s Eugene Onegin featuring Valery Gergiev at the podium and Anna Netrebko on-stage, to protest recent Russian laws restricting homosexualist propaganda.
According to The New York Times, which we must acknowledge as expert in matters both New York and homosexual, if not Russian, the homosexualists made good on their threat: (more…)
GOD did not realize when he created the world out of pure nothingness, when he dignified human nature above all else, when he entered into history to become an actual human being, when he offered a path to salvation and eternal bliss to both men and women, when he spoke in the person of Jesus Christ to men and women on the shores of the Galilee, when he miraculously cured women of sickness, when he himself suffered torture and murder, when he further elevated all of nature by entering into inanimate matter in the form of simple unleavened bread and offered this miracle of deepest and most tender affection for both men and women to enjoy and revere for all of time, or when he inspired female saints to mystical visions and heroic self-sacrifice, that he was not creating a "profound theology of the woman." Fortunately, Pope Francis has assured us that the Novus Ordo Church can come up with something more profound than all this. In his recent interview, he stated: "We have to work harder to develop a profound theology of the woman." He then suggests what is involved: power.
Comments Off on It Ain’t Profound Enough for Women
THREE of the attackers involved in the Nairobi mall assault were Somalis from Minnesota, the Kenyan government confirmed yesterday. Read a report by The Daily Mail here.
Comments Off on American Somalis Involved in Kenyan Attack
COMMENTS have been added to the original entry on the 12,000-word mega-interview with Pope Francis, an event of great significance. Here is an additional comment by a reader:
Catherine H. writes:
I am particularly taken aback by discovering how many of my husband’s and my friends and family, who generally agree with us on our “ultraconservative” stance in most other areas, see Pope Francis and this particular interview in a completely different light. (more…)
Yet another feminist breaks down under the stress of working and having a family and passes the buck to society at large. In this article about Katrina Alcorn and her book Maxed Out: American Moms on the Brink, one thingstood out for me:
“If you’re feeling on your edge, you need to figure out how to take care of yourself by any means necessary. I heard a story recently about a mom who took a vacation from her family for a month. She felt she had to completely remove herself and stay with friends for a month and recoup.”
I could not imagine leaving my family for a month! I could not imagine having a husband who would let me either.
Thank you for all the work you do – have a lovely weekend!
THEfront page headlinein The New York Times is like something out of The Onion, except wait, it’s actually true: “Pope Says Church Is ‘Obsessed’ With Gays, Abortion and Birth Control.” It can’t get any better than this, except perhaps if the entire Arctic ice cap melted in a day, proving once and for all that Al Gore was right.
The blogger Mundabor dissects the “papal enchilada,” the 12,000-word interview of Pope Francis that appeared in a Jesuit magazine, an interview which hardly anyone is likely to read in its entirety, even though I can honestly say I did. Mundabor wisely cautions readers against defining heresy as a total rejection oforthodoxy. Sure, there are reassuring statements in the interview, but then there are so many whoppers, there is so much rubbery cheese, that this truly did belong on the front page of all the major newspapers. If the Pope’s statements were authoritative doctrine, then the Vatican would be post-Catholic — and for many people, that would be wonderful news.
Mundabor writes:
The sum total of all these assertions – all of them, word for word quotations – and of all that Francis has said, and omitted to say, since the beginning of the pontificate – is clear: don’t fight it. Francis espouses a defeatist line somewhere between Chamberlain and Quisling, with some very worrying streaks of Grima Wormtongue. (more…)
IN a massive, 12,000-word interview with Fr. Antonio Spadaro of LaCiviltà Cattolica, Pope Francis expounds upon the worldview that has emerged in his confusing statements in recent months. His remarks in the interview, which has no authority as Church teaching and represents his personal views, lack clarity also. But the Pope makes it clear just how deep his liberalism runs. He calls for a “dynamic of reading the Gospel, actualizing its message for today.” (more…)
The supine surrender of their legitimate authority by American white men is one of the most sickening spectacles I have witnessed in my life.
One day not long ago my cousin and I were reminiscing about our grandfather, who died many years ago at age 89. “He was strict,” my cousin remarked when remembering him from our boyhood years. I imagine he meant that remark not as a criticism but simply as an observation.
When I was young, I too probably imagined him to be strict. But “strict” in comparison with what? Was he ever a petty tyrant? Never. Not even remotely. He was “strict” in the sense of being disciplined and principled. (more…)
Comments Off on The Disappearance of the “Strict” Man
IN August, 2012, the feminist revolutionary Shulamith Firestone, who had been psychotic off and on for many years, was found dead in her New York apartment at the age of 67. An autopsy was never done, but she probably died of starvation. It was the lonely end of a once brilliant career. Firestone’s famous 1970 book, The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution, envisioned a utopian world in which the biological family is replaced by “households” of free love and absolute individual autonomy. It is still considered a feminist classic. Raised an Orthodox Jew in a family of six children, Firestone had the characteristic father-hatred of atheistic, intellectual Jewish women. She hated the family — both the idea and the reality — with a burning passion, admired Marx and Engels and believed men were incapable of love.
In many ways, as this May article in The New Yorker by the feminist author Susan Faludi suggests, Firestone was prophetic. Her predictions of a depersonalized, androgynous society, a world in which children are sexualized and disconnected from their biological parents, have been at least partly realized. Ironically, Firestone, who never married or had children, encountered abysmal disappointment in her relations with other feminists, who turned out to be not such wonderful surrogate sisters. In the end, it was a biological relationship — her connection with her sister Laya — which provided her with the most sustaining comfort in life. There is a heartbreaking moment in Faludi’s article in which Laya tries to make contact with her demented sister and walks by her apartment while talking to her on the phone. She asks her sister to look out the window, but she refuses. The suicide of Firestone’s brother, Daniel, helped push her into madness, Laya said. Firestone believed all abiding love was a form of madness so it is not surprising she went insane.
I highly recommend Faludi’s piece, as disturbing as it is. It’s the story of a feminine Nietzsche (without the literary brilliance), a woman searching for transcendence in a creed without transcendence. Firestone is always referred to as a “radical feminist.” But the truth is she was just a feminist who articulated the radical implications of all feminism. Not everyone lives those radical implications, but nevertheless they are there. In that sense, Firestone was a truth teller. Even the most moderate of feminists contend that a male conspiracy against women has historically defined Western civilization. If this conspiracy existed and was so powerful that women were kept from fulfilling themselves then men are indeed incapable of love, in which case the dependence of women is just a form of slavery, as Firestone argued. Interestingly, Firestone’s feminism was energized by the rudeness and coarse behavior of male leftists in the 1960s, who didn’t have much respect for their promiscuous partners.
