“Birth Control” Is Humbug

IN 1927, G.K. Chesterton wrote:
There is of course a great deal more to be said. I have dealt with only one feature of Birth Control – its exceedingly unpleasant origin. I said it was purely capitalist and reactionary; I venture to say I have proved it was entirely capitalist and reactionary. But there are many other aspects of this evil thing. It is unclean in the light of the instincts; it is unnatural in relation to the affections; it is part of a general attempt to run the populace on a routine of quack medicine and smelly science; it is mixed up with a muddled idea that women are free when they serve their employers but slaves when they help their husbands; it is ignorant of the very existence of real households where prudence comes by free-will and agreement. It has all those aspects, and many of them would be extraordinarily interesting to discuss. But in order not to occupy too much space, I will take as a text nothing more than the title.
A Piece of Humbug
The very name of ‘Birth Control’ is a piece of pure humbug. It is one of those blatant euphemisms used in the headlines of the Trust Press. It is like ‘Tariff Reform.’ It is like ‘Free Labour.’ It is meant to mean nothing, that it may mean anything, and especially some thing totally different from what it says.
Everybody believes in birth control, and nearly everybody has exercised some control over the conditions of birth. People do not get married as somnambulists or have children in their sleep. But throughout numberless ages and nations, the normal and real birth control is called self control. (more…)


