Fakery in Boulder
MILES MATHIS shoots holes through the Boulder “mass shooting.” He comes up with connections to Hollywood, intelligence, the military, Wall Street and AstraZeneca. It’s no accident that this event took place in the Denver suburbs, where other fake massacres distracting and terrorizing the American public into submission have been staged. He ends his research article with this:
OK, I am tiring of this, but if you want to do more, I suggest you read closely the Washington Post victims announcement, which doesn’t read like it should. What a sensible person would expect is a few lines about each victim, sticking to the facts. You wouldn’t expect them to be unloading a lot of tearjerking emotionalism on you, since—if real—the event is sad enough on its own. You don’t need your response telegraphed like this, do you? You don’t need to be told what to feel. But as is usual with these events, the whole thing is being keyed up with pregnant women, dancing people, balloons, and other sugary anecdotes. To be blunt, the whole page reads like amateurish propaganda, composed by the usual set of barely literate recruits in sub-basement 10 at Langley. You don’t really learn anything about the victims; instead you read a bunch of unverifiable treacle about how they loved puppies or puppies loved them or something. It’s pathetic. You could judge the whole event by the tone of this article, and I do. The way it is written tells us without further research we are being yanked. The page reeks of desperation and miscalculation.
This is not a blanket endorsement of Mr. Mathis. I sincerely appreciate his hard work here. (Please avoid his artworks page.) You have to have courage, a healthy sense of outrage and a capacity for hours of thankless tedium to go into the details of these events. (more…)

