ALAN writes:
In regard to Morgan C’s commentary (Sept. 4) on the Lindsay Clancy case:
1. What is “organic news”? Does that mean the truth? Why is “organic news” better than “the truth”?
2. The Lindsay Clancy “case” is said to be a “televised circus”. But of course. Everything that gets presented on television is a circus, a show, a theatrical performance–or is made into one. (But fictional stories not nearly so much as the “evening news” and “documentaries”.)
3. Morgan’s assessment of the ballyhoo in the Lindsay Clancy “case” is largely correct. But the professional mendacity on display throughout that ballyhoo is more fundamental than she seems to realize. It begins with vocabulary.
Men who seek to attain power over other people cannot come right out and say so in plain words. To achieve that goal, they invent arcane vocabularies of impressive-sounding words to deceive their intended victims (meaning: all of us). Hence, the creation of a fake “science” called psychiatry. Its practitioners have no interest in science in the correct sense of the word. Like politicians–who are of course equally deceitful–their goal has always been power over other people. They are shrewd enough to conceal that truth behind a facade of authoritative-looking words engineered to fool credulous people. Naturally, they portray themselves as do-gooders and claim incessantly that the silly things they say and write are “Science”. (A notorious liar named Fauci claimed he is “Science”.)
Morgan is one among countless good people who take their self-serving claims at face value. Her commentary includes the terms “mental health”, “psychiatric expertise”, “postpartum depression”, and “schizoaffective disorder”. (That last is just darling. Think of all the shyster “doctors” who are green with envy for not having invented it sooner.) She expressed no skepticism (as most readers will express none) regarding the veracity of those terms. I have said before and will say again: There are no such things. The veracity in those terms is hard to pin down because it does not exist. I deny the existence of all those things. When printed, they are nothing but inkblots on paper. When spoken, they are nothing but noise-crafted-to-deceive. Such words and phrases are stratagems for gaining power over other people. Morgan seems to imagine that that is something new. To be sure, the Lindsay Clancy flap may be the latest example of opportunism by doctors, psychiatrists, the pharmaceutical racket, the “mental health” racket, the “forensic psychiatry” racket, the law racket, and parasitical government bureaucrats (excuse the redundancy). But such deception in the pursuit of power over other people’s lives is as old as voodoo.
Morgan argues that the purpose of all the self-serving professional rhetoric is “to manufacture public consent” for surrendering power to a partnership between government and the do-gooder professions. But that is wholly unnecessary. Americans have already done that. For many decades now, they have shown their willingness to be deceived by a long list of fake “diseases” and fake “treatments” concocted by practitioners of the Voodoo Science called “psychiatry”. Along with that willingness, they have shown themselves perfectly willing to surrender other people’s rights and privacy, objective standards of law enforcement, the responsibility to hold lawbreakers accountable, and the rule of law itself–which is to be replaced in the New World Order by the self-serving assertions of those Voodoo Doctors and their innumerable compatriots in government-sanctioned deception and fraud.
Laura writes:
There are always new horizons for the government-supervised Psychological Industrial Complex and its project of undermining its chief rival — the family.
Americans have not surrendered all yet.
The objectives Morgan C. mentions are astute predictions. It is still necessary — most definitely — to come up with ways through the “mainstream news” to achieve these goals:
Universal Psychiatric Screening of Mothers: A manufactured crisis designed to funnel every single pregnant woman and new mother directly into the pharmaceutical pipeline, creating millions of lifetime customers before they even leave the recovery room.
Predictive AI Risk Algorithms at Delivery: Implementing intrusive data-mining systems in hospitals to calculate a mother’s “risk profile,” transforming the natural act of childbirth into a proprietary software metric controlled by tech defense contractors.
Specialized Reproductive Mental Health Clinics: Expanding institutional real estate to pathologize normal postpartum exhaustion, ensuring a centralized, state-approved facility exists to monitor and medicate the population.
The “Moms Matter Act” and Similar Bills: Federal and state legislation drafted by corporate lobbyists that effectively turns basic parenting into a state-supervised clinical category, stripping away familial autonomy under the guise of public health.
Motherhood is by nature in competition with the absolute state.
Yes, it has already been devastated, but it must be further pathologized. It must be managed, placed under constant suspicion and undermined through psychological warfare. Only with ongoing warfare against the normal human instincts can this new form of dictatorship be achieved. These stories are mental artillery no matter how unwitting or innocent the journalists involved are.
I don’t claim to know what exactly happened with Lindsay Clancy and any children she may have had. What is true and what is not true is beyond my knowledge and I don’t care to find out. To delve into the circus is like walking through a stenching sewer.
Regardless of what the facts in the case are, this story is being used for nefarious purposes.
