WINTER WATCH predicted in October of last year the election fraud of 2020: Research at Argonne National Laboratories revealed that a single individual with physical access to a voting machine, can install inexpensive, readily-available electronic components to manipulate its functions. Winter Watch predicts the 2020 presidential election will make the 2000 chads debacle look like a piker — and it will be deliberately and malevolently arranged that way. It is likely to be manufactured to be close. The perfect storm. Election technology will be full-court third world. More information on election technology is in its repost linked above.  

FOR those of us who believe face masks are harmful -- physically, mentally, socially and spiritually -- the Biden "victory" is potentially good news. The face mask has now become a political symbol like never before. Joe and Kamala love it. Their faces were rarely seen on the campaign trail. They probably even wear masks to bed. And they have threatened to mandate masks nationally. Why do people wear face masks? They wear them because they want to; it's as simple as that. They wear them because they believe they are medically justified; they are sincerely concerned about harming or offending others; they trust government health officials; they feel pressured to wear one or maybe they would like to signal their virtue. In other words, people wear masks because they want to wear them. I am not critical of individuals for simply doing this. I am not attacking individuals who want to wear a mask. I am critical of the government and businesses for pretending they can force everyone to wear a mask and for punishing those who do not wish to wear them. The government has nothing beyond threats to make millions of people don a medical device. The Covid regime is based on bluff. The government is not going to put people in jail by the tens of thousands over the issue. Only the most blatant distortion of the Constitution could uphold a mask mandate in court when there…

TERESA Stanfill Benns has written a piece about the presidential election at her website Betrayed Catholics. She draws on her experience as a newspaper reporter in Colorado during a disputed election. "The county I covered was a longtime Democrat stronghold. Republicans and Independents were not held in high esteem. It was a good ole boy and girl pat-my-back-and-I’ll-pat-yours arrangement that had worked well for quite some time, and the powers that be saw no need to change course. It was that way then and it is that way now, both in that county and in many places nationally. Democrats also controlled the irregular elections held in a small town in that same county. I cannot change the facts or deny what I saw with my own eyes. Not that Republicans are guiltless, as the election article link above explains. But for this time and this election, fueled by a hatred deliberately exacerbated by the media and Democrat politicians, they had both the opportunity and the motive to flip this election." Benns suggests a new election in contested states with paper ballots supervised by the National Guard. She makes interesting connections between presidential vote fraud and the subversion of the Catholic Church through a false papal election in 1958.  

FOR crying out loud, can’t they conduct ONE psyop without a drill beforehand?

The Transition Integrity Project (TIP) was a series of June 2020 political scenario exercises in the United States, involving over 100 current and former senior government and campaign leaders, academics, journalists, polling experts and former federal and state government officials. The exercises examined potential disruptions to the 2020 presidential election and transition.^[1][2][3][4] TIP is not an organization, but rather a short-term project run under the auspices of the organization Protect Democracy.

The Transition Integrity Project was initially organized in late 2019^[5] by Rosa Brooks, a law professor at Georgetown and former Pentagon senior official, and Nils Gilman, a former vice chancellor of the University of California, Berkeley and historian at the Berggruen Institute. Other participants in the Transition Integrity Project’s exercises included:^[3][6][7] (more…)

THE mainstream media has called the election for Biden. It has no authority to do so when there are so many questions about vote counts. This is all about instigating chaos. But, boy, was I wrong about how they would do it. I'm no fan of Donald Trump. I didn't even vote for him (or Biden) this week. But calling this election now is a gross injustice. How could tens of thousands come out to vote for Republicans for Congress and state legislatures and then vote for Biden? How could the turnout in places like Wisconsin and Philadelphia have been greater for Biden, whom nobody likes, than the hugely popular Obama? How could 150,000 Michiganers vote for president but not in the Senate race? How could six states where Trump was ahead all flip to Biden? How could this 77-year-old with mild dementia and a penchant for pawing children get more votes than anyone in history? They are mocking you. We were tipped off weeks ago when Kamala Harris asked Pence during the debate if Trump would leave the White House if he did not accept the election results and when Trudeau said he was going to send troops if Trump refused to accept results. How could they know? Trump voters put up with a stinking swamp, shuttered businesses, lockdowns, drag queens, riots, pardoned crooks, open borders, and chemtrails. They were betrayed by their hero. Will they put up with…

JOHN HARRIS writes at his blog:

As practically idiotic as any program must be that aims to ensure the “health of the collective”, I’m infinitely more disturbed by the moral assumptions—the immoral presumption, I should say—behind collectivist hygiene.  The very idea that my society has the right to make me impede my airflow out of consideration for others is the most maniacally self-centered inversion of selflessness imaginable.  I exist.  You exist.  Each of us poses certain potential threats to all others around us through the mere fact of our existence.  We might misstep on an escalator with dozens of people below us.  We might swipe an incautious pedestrian starting across an intersection while we’re peering at street signs.  We might drop something that creates a sudden racket in the presence of a cardiac patient.  Human life is a constant stream of such risks. (more…)

  "Biden and Trump are irrelevant, except insofar as they are used to create chaos ... Chaos is the goal.." -- Ron Paul  

 

(more…)

MARKY MARK writes:

I think that Pres. Trump will ultimately win, but it’ll be by the thinnest of margins. I also think that the courts will decide the “election.” Why do I say this? The globalists can’t get what they want otherwise.

In order to bring in martial law, there must be anger and unrest; there must be mass rioting all over the country. Then the question becomes: how to spark the mass rioting? Have Biden appear to be winning, only to have Trump “steal” it from him. This will anger the Biden supporters, some of whom are BLM and Antifa, and they’ll riot.

You can see the mass media setting this up as we speak. Notice how they called the Biden leaning states early? (more…)

New York Times exit polls  

THINGS are unfolding as seamlessly as a bad script. We're a captive audience. Image Source.  

NP writes:

Looks like Trump lost.  Of course it’s all very suspicious – a state can count all the votes in a few hours, but if it’s a swing state with a lot of Democratic voters in a county, then it takes hours?

I don’t know anything about election laws, but I assume you only recount the ballots, not the entire system (no voter ID, etc.). (more…)

FROM “The Modern Surrender of Woman” by G.K. Chesterton:

… Openly and to all appearance, this ancestral conflict has silently and abruptly ended; one of the two sexes has suddenly surrendered to the other. By the beginning of the twentieth century, within the last few years, the woman has in public surrendered to the man. She has seriously and officially owned that the man has been right all along; that the public house (or Parliament) is really more important than the private house; that politics are not (as woman had always maintained) an excuse for pots of beer, but are a sacred solemnity to which new female worshipers may kneel; that the talkative patriots in the tavern are not only admirable but enviable; that talk is not a waste of time, and therefore (as a consequence, surely) that taverns are not a waste of money. All we men had grown used to our wives and mothers, and grandmothers, and great aunts all pouring a chorus of contempt upon our hobbies of sport, drink and party politics. (more…)