The Law vs. the Soft Pink Jello

ALAN writes:
It must have been in 1955 or ’56 when my mother permitted me to stay up long enough to watch a TV police drama that was telecast in St. Louis at 9 or 9:30 p.m. She would likely have watched it anyway, even aside from my enthusiasm for it. It was a syndicated program called Highway Patrol. It featured tough-guy movie actor Broderick Crawford as the hero, Captain Dan Mathews. I was six to seven years old. Something in the program inspired my respect. I looked forward to it every week. But of course at that age, I could not articulate why it impressed me.
Now, seventy years later, it is perfectly clear. In recent months, I have watched dozens of episodes of Highway Patrol. The essence of that program lay in its moral-philosophical frame of mind. The stories were well-written and tightly edited. They were about good and evil. They embodied a code of moral standards that were shared by nearly all Americans in those years. There was no moral ambiguity or uncertainty in those episodes. The job of the Highway Patrol was to defend the lives, property, and rights of law-abiding citizens.
I was in the early years of parochial school when Highway Patrol inspired my respect. I enjoyed watching it and two other syndicated programs in those years — Rescue 8 and Sea Hunt — because they showed confident men doing heroic things to uphold a fixed code of moral-philosophical-cultural standards.











