The “Meta-Religion” of Liberals
SAM writes:
I wanted to comment on your post “Are All Religions ‘True?'” because it is something I have been thinking about a lot recently. I regularly interact with white liberals of the “spiritual, but not religious” variety and they all tend to think that the major religions are interchangeable and equal.
Not only is this view incoherent, it displays a breathtaking hubris which masquerades as humility. It is incoherent because it violates logic at the most rudimentary level: it maintains that contradictory propositions can be true simultaneously. The liberal refuses to face up to fact that either Jesus is God incarnate or he isn’t; either Muhammad is God’s prophet or he isn’t; either the soul will face divine judgment after death or it won’t; either the extirpation of all desire is highest goal of spiritual enlightenment or it isn’t. The liberal refuses to face this because, once these stark alternatives are seriously acknowledged, one is put into the uncomfortable position of having to make an existential choice where the possibility of error is real and the consequences of error are of the utmost gravity. (more…)




