St. Joseph Was Not an Old Man

ST. JOSEPH, the greatest of saints whose feast day is today, is depicted in many artworks as a gray-haired, bearded man of advanced age. Though these works often convey the wisdom, dignity, affectionate nature and profound sanctity of the man, they are most probably not realistic as to his age. There is good reason to believe Joseph was in the prime of life — about forty years old — at the time of his betrothal to Mary and had a physical appearance of noticeable manly beauty.
His relative youthfulness, compared to the common view, meant that he was fully able to fulfill his role as father, guardian and protector and be an appropriate spouse and companion in the eyes of the world to Mary. Marriages between old men and young women have always in all times suggested coercion, material motives or ambition, not mutual attraction. Though Mary and Joseph took vows of virginity, they were still husband and wife, filled with tenderness and deepest affection for each other.
More on this from The Life and Glories of St. Joseph by Edwin Healey Thompson (1888):
WE must pause here awhile to give a few words of consideration to the disputed question as to the age of Joseph at the time of his espousals with Mary. Three opinions have been held, one of which would make our saint far advanced in years. This opinion was accepted by some of the Fathers and ancient ecclesiastical writers, chiefly Greek; and in support of it has been urged the custom prevailing among painters of representing St. Joseph as an aged man, sometimes as almost decrepit. This view has, however, been strongly opposed, not only because it had no other ground to rest upon than the statements of Pseudo-Gospels which were current in the third and fourth centuries, and were coupled with the assertion that Joseph was a widower with many children, an assertion forcibly condemned by St. Jerome and a host of other Fathers and theological writers down to the present time, but also as in itself presenting insuperable difficulties. As we have already observed, these apocryphal writings, while probably recording some true traditionary facts, are entirely devoid of authority, and contain, moreover, much that we naturally reject as both improbable and unbefitting. (more…)







